A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and Use

A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and Use
复制标题

DOI:
10.1145/3501385.3543967
复制
发表时间:
2022-08
期刊:
Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Oleson;Benjamin Xie;Jean Salac;Jayne Everson;F. M. Kivuva;Amy J. Ko
A. Oleson;Benjamin Xie;Jean Salac;Jayne Everson;F. M. Kivuva;Amy J. Ko
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Oleson;Benjamin Xie;Jean Salac;Jayne Everson;F. M. Kivuva;Amy J. Ko

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

计算教育研究(CER)使用人口统计数据来了解学习者的身份,背景和环境,例如文化响应的计算从非主导群体中进一步边缘化的人的结构。 . We conducted a content analysis of 510 peer-reviewed papers published in 12 CER venues from 2012 to 2021. We found that (1) 60% of papers studioded older learners in formal contexts (i.e. post-secondary education); (2) 68论文的百分比尚不清楚研究人员如何收集人口统计学数据,而94%的论文是单一站点的研究,只有14%的人解决了其上下文的局限性。潜水员)在23%的论文中,通过不完整的人口统计报告(即,在其样本中遗漏了某些参与者的人口统计学),我们在35%的论文中讨论了这些发现对CER领域的含义,这提出了CER研究人员的考虑。在收集,报告和使用人口统计数据时请记住。
Computing education research (CER) has used demographic data to understand learners’ identities, backgrounds, and contexts for efforts such as culturally-responsive computing. Prior work indicates that failing to elucidate and critically engage with the implicit assumptions of a field can unintentionally reinforce power structures that further marginalize people from non-dominant groups. The goal of this paper is two-fold: to understand what populations CER researchers have studied, and to surface implicit assumptions about how researchers have collected, reported, and used demographic data on these populations. We conducted a content analysis of 510 peer-reviewed papers published in 12 CER venues from 2012 to 2021. We found that (1) 60% of papers studied older learners in formal contexts (i.e. post-secondary education); (2) 68% of papers left unclear how researchers collected demographic data; and (3) while 94% of papers were single-site studies, only 14% addressed the limitations of their contexts. We also identified hegemonic norms through ambiguous aggregate term usage (e.g. underrepresented, diverse) in 23% of papers, and through incomplete reporting of demographics (i.e. leaving out demographics for some participants in their sample) in 35% of papers. We discuss the implications of these findings for the CER field, raising considerations for CER researchers to keep in mind when collecting, reporting, and using demographic data.