A critique of the second consensus criteria for multiple system atrophy
A critique of the second consensus criteria for multiple system atrophy
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mds.27701
复制
发表时间:
2019-07-01
影响因子:
8.6
通讯作者:
Wenning, Gregor K.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stankovic, Iva;Quinn, Niall;Wenning, Gregor K.
Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is an adult-onset progressive neurodegenerative disorder that manifests clinically with autonomic failure, parkinsonism, and ataxia in any combination. Oligodendroglial cytoplasmatic inclusions consisting of misfolded α-synuclein are a pathological hallmark of disease. 1 The clinical diagnosis of MSA is typically delayed as a result of incomplete or nonspecific manifestations during early disease stages. 2, 3 Quinn first published diagnostic criteria for MSA in 1989. 4 Since then, the first consensus criteria in 19985 and their revision in 20086 have been widely accepted as diagnostic guidelines for MSA. In a clinicopathological study examining the validity of the second consensus criteria, 6 the sensitivities for possible and probable MSA at first visit were 41% and 18%, respectively, increasing to 92% and 63% at last visit. 7 In a recent brain bank study on 134 patients retrospectively assigned a diagnosis of possible or probable MSA according to the second consensus criteria, 6 only 83 (62%) met the pathological criteria for MSA: the most common causes of misdiagnosis were dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in 19 (37%) followed by progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) in 15 (29%) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) in 8 (15%) cases. 8 Developing good diagnostic tools in the early disease stages is a prerequisite for an estimation of disease prognosis and evaluation of novel disease-modifying treatments in clinical trials. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to achieve very good specificity and to overcome the poor sensitivity of the existing criteria at the first neurological visit. The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) MSA Study Group developed a questionnaire (see Table 1) highlighting the critical issues associated with the second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of MSA. 6 The questionnaire was distributed among the coauthors who provided feedback resulting in the present critique.