Maintenance Olaparib for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Maintenance Olaparib for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1903387
复制
发表时间:
2019-07-25
影响因子:
158.5
通讯作者:
Kindler, Hedy L.
Kindler, Hedy L.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Golan, Talia;Hammel, Pascal;Kindler, Hedy L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景 具有种系 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的患者是转移性胰腺癌患者的一小部分。聚(腺苷二磷酸核糖)聚合酶 (PARP) 抑制剂奥拉帕尼在此人群中具有抗肿瘤活性。方法我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验,以评估奥拉帕尼作为维持治疗对具有种系 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变、转移性胰腺癌以及在一线铂类化疗期间未进展的疾病的患者的疗效。患者以 3:2 的比例随机分配接受奥拉帕尼维持片剂(300 毫克,每日两次)或安慰剂治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期,通过盲法独立中央审查进行评估。结果在接受筛查的 3315 名患者中,154 名接受随机分组并被分配至试验干预组(92 名接受奥拉帕尼,62 名接受安慰剂)。奥拉帕尼组的中位无进展生存期显着长于安慰剂组(7.4 个月 vs. 3.8 个月;疾病进展或死亡的风险比,0.53;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.35 至 0.82;P=0.004)。数据成熟度为 46% 的总体生存期中期分析显示,奥拉帕尼组和安慰剂组之间没有差异(中位生存期为 18.9 个月 vs. 18.1 个月;死亡风险比为 0.91;95% CI,0.56 至 1.46;P=0.68)。根据欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织的生活质量问卷调查,全球生活质量评分(100分制,分数越高表明生活质量越好)相对于基线的总体变化表明,健康相关生活质量没有显着的组间差异(组间差异,-2.47分;95% CI,-7.27至2.33)。奥拉帕尼组 3 级或以上不良事件的发生率为 40%,安慰剂组为 23%(组间差异,16 个百分点;95% CI,-0.02 至 31);分别有 5% 和 2% 的患者因不良事件而停止试验干预。 结论 在患有种系 BRCA 突变和转移性胰腺癌的患者中,维持奥拉帕尼组的无进展生存期比安慰剂组更长。
BackgroundPatients with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation make up a small subgroup of those with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib has had antitumor activity in this population.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients who had a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer and disease that had not progressed during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, to receive maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed by blinded independent central review.ResultsOf the 3315 patients who underwent screening, 154 underwent randomization and were assigned to a trial intervention (92 to receive olaparib and 62 to receive placebo). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (7.4 months vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.82; P=0.004). An interim analysis of overall survival, at a data maturity of 46%, showed no difference between the olaparib and placebo groups (median, 18.9 months vs. 18.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.46; P=0.68). There was no significant between-group difference in health-related quality of life, as indicated by the overall change from baseline in the global quality-of-life score (on a 100-point scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (between-group difference, -2.47 points; 95% CI, -7.27 to 2.33). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 40% in the olaparib group and 23% in the placebo group (between-group difference, 16 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.02 to 31); 5% and 2% of the patients, respectively, discontinued the trial intervention because of an adverse event.ConclusionsAmong patients with a germline BRCA mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer, progression-free survival was longer with maintenance olaparib than with placebo.