Computer-assisted instruction: An effective instructional method for HIV prevention education?
Computer-assisted instruction: An effective instructional method for HIV prevention education?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00093-2
复制
发表时间：
2000-04-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Harris, KK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evans, AE;Edmundson-Drane, EW;Harris, KK
目的：为了比较计算机辅助教学（CAI）为基础的干预的有效性，以更传统的讲座为基础的干预影响心理社会相关的人类免疫缺陷病毒（HIV）preventive behaviors.Methods：学生参加了人类性行为课程（N = 152）被随机分配到三个组之一：CAI，讲座，或无干预组。CAI组的参与者回顾了1小时长的CAI程序，演讲组的参与者接受了1小时长的演讲，无干预组的参与者没有接受任何干预。在完成各自的干预措施后，所有参与者都完成了艾滋病毒问卷调查，该问卷调查了与艾滋病毒预防行为相关的社会认知理论结构。MANCOVA，ANCOVA和事后分析被用来测试三组之间的显着差异。结果：分析显示，相比，在演讲组，CAI组的参与者得分显着更高的量表测量自身免疫缺陷综合征（AIDS）的知识，自我评价结果的动机和意图，实践与当前的合作伙伴的艾滋病预防行为。此外，与无干预组相比，CAI组得分显着较高的量表测量身体结果的动机和社会结果的动机。结论：CAI为基础。项目可以有效地提供艾滋病毒预防方面的指导。然而，由于某些限制，这种类型的计划最好作为使用几种不同交付系统的更全面干预的一部分。(C)青少年医学协会，2000年。
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of a compute-assisted instruction (CAI)-based intervention to a more traditional lecture-based intervention for influencing psychosocial correlates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preventive behaviors.Methods: Students enrolled in a Human Sexuality course (N = 152) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: CAI,Lecture, or No Intervention group. Participants in the CAI group reviewed a 1-hour long CAI program, participants in the Lecture group were presented with a 1-hour long lecture, and participants in the No Intervention group received no intervention. After completing the respective interventions, all participants completed the HIV questionnaire, which, measured selected Social Cognitive Theory constructs associated with HIV preventive behaviors. MANCOVA, ANCOVA and Post Hoc analyses were utilized to test for significant differences among the three groups.Results: The analyses disclosed that, compared to participants in the Lecture group, participants in the CAI group scored significantly higher on the scales measuring autoimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) knowledge, self-evaluative outcome motivation and intention to practice HIV preventive behaviors with current partner. In addition, compared to the No Intervention group, the CAI group scored significantly higher on the scales measuring physical outcome motivation and social outcome motivation.Conclusions: CAI-based. programs can be effective for delivering instruction on HIV prevention. However, because of certain limitations, this type of program is best utilized as part of a more comprehensive intervention that uses several different delivery systems. (C) Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2000.