Hybrid biological, electron beam and zero-valent nano iron treatment of recalcitrant metalworking fluids.
Hybrid biological, electron beam and zero-valent nano iron treatment of recalcitrant metalworking fluids.
复制标题
顽固金属加工液的混合生物、电子束和零价纳米铁处理。
DOI：
10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.028
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
12.8
通讯作者：
Thill PG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thill PG
研究了有毒难降解工业废水的复合修复和解毒方法。重点是废金属加工液，它被选为其他有毒、顽固和需要更可持续的安全处置途径的废液的代表模型。混合方法包括生物降解、电子束照射和零价纳米铁高级氧化工艺，这些工艺分别采用析因设计并按顺序采用。为了比较工艺性能，比较了操作耗尽的金属加工液和纯净的金属加工液。顺序混合电子束照射、生物、纳米零价铁和生物处理导致了两种顽固水流的协同解毒和降解，由互补替代品确定，并导致总体COD去除从原始金属加工液的85.9%±33.4%提高到92.8%±71.4%。电子束前处理使生物处理效果更好，COD值分别为69.5%±28.8%(p=0.005)和24.6%±44.8%(p=0.044)。
Hybrid approaches for the remediation and detoxification of toxic recalcitrant industrial wastewater were investigated. The focus was waste metalworking fluid, which was selected as a representative model of other waste streams that are toxic, recalcitrant and that require more sustainable routes of safe disposal. The hybrid approaches included biodegradation, electron beam irradiation and zero-valent nano iron advanced oxidation processes that were employed individually and in sequence employing a factorial design. To compare process performance operationally exhausted and pristine metalworking fluid were compared. Sequential hybrid electron beam irradiation, biological, nanoscale zero-valent iron and biological treatment lead to synergistic detoxification and degradation of both recalcitrant streams, as determined by complementary surrogates and lead to overall improved COD removal of 92.8 ± 1.4% up from 85.9 ± 3.4% for the pristine metalworking fluid. Electron beam pre-treatment enabled more effective biotreatment, achieving 69.5 ± 8% (p = 0.005) and 24.6 ± 4.8% (p = 0.044) COD reductions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
S. M. Haji-saeid;M. Sampa;Á. Sáfrány;S. Sabharwal;N. Ramamoorthy
通讯作者：
S. M. Haji-saeid;M. Sampa;Á. Sáfrány;S. Sabharwal;N. Ramamoorthy
DOI：
10.1007/s00244-003-0257-4
发表时间：
2005-04-01
影响因子：
4
作者：
Drzewicz, P;Gehringer, P;Trojanowicz, M
通讯作者：
Trojanowicz, M
影响因子：
11.4
作者：
Ivan Rodriguez-Verde;L. Regueiro;R. Pena;J. A. Álvarez;J. Lema;M. Carballa
通讯作者：
Ivan Rodriguez-Verde;L. Regueiro;R. Pena;J. A. Álvarez;J. Lema;M. Carballa
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
P. Gehringer;H. Eschweiler;H. Fiedler
通讯作者：
H. Fiedler
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
A. K. Pikaev;A. Bludenko;I. E. Makarov;A. Ponomarev;V. Minin;V. Ponomarev;O. Linnik
通讯作者：
O. Linnik