Development of Cross-Culturally Informed Leisure-Time Physical Activity Constraint and Constraint Negotiation Typologies: The Case of Japanese and Euro-Canadian Adults

Development of Cross-Culturally Informed Leisure-Time Physical Activity Constraint and Constraint Negotiation Typologies: The Case of Japanese and Euro-Canadian Adults
复制标题

跨文化的休闲时间身体活动约束和约束谈判类型的发展:以日本和欧洲加拿大成年人为例

DOI:
10.1080/01490400.2018.1446064
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
G. Walker
G. Walker
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Ito;Shintaro Kono;G. Walker

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要本研究的目的有两个:归纳发展跨文化的闲暇体育活动(LTPA)约束和约束谈判类型学,并调查文化的异同LTPA约束和约束谈判使用新开发的类型学和传统的西方类型学。通过在线调查从211名欧洲加拿大人和183名日本人那里获得了有用的数据。主题分析确定了9个约束类别(心理,生理和身体健康,生活方式,人际,财务,时间,承诺,环境和LTPA具体)和9个约束谈判策略(心理,生理和身体健康,生活方式,人际,财务,时间和三个LTPA具体:修改,管理和自我适应)。多变量协方差分析确定没有文化差异时,传统的类型学进行了分析。然而,当对文化信息类型进行类似分析时,与日本人相比,欧洲加拿大人报告了(a)更多的时间限制和更少的LTPA特定限制,以及(B)更多的财务和时间谈判策略和LTPA特定(即,管理)谈判策略较少。
ABSTRACT Our study purposes were twofold: to inductively develop cross-culturally informed leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) constraint and constraint negotiation typologies and to investigate cultural similarities and differences in LTPA constraints and constraint negotiation using both the newly developed typologies and conventional Western typologies. Useable data were obtained from 211 Euro-Canadians and 183 Japanese using online surveys. A thematic analysis identified nine constraint categories (psychological, physiological and physical fitness, lifestyle, interpersonal, financial, time, commitment, environmental, and LTPA-specific) and nine constraint negotiation strategies (psychological, physiological and physical fitness, lifestyle, interpersonal, financial, time, and three LTPA-specific: modification, management, and self-adaptation). Multivariate analysis of covariance identified no cultural differences when the conventional typologies were analyzed. However, when the culturally informed typologies were similarly analyzed, compared to Japanese, Euro-Canadians reported (a) time constraints more and LTPA-specific constraints less and (b) financial and time negotiation strategies more and the LTPA-specific (i.e., management) negotiation strategies less.
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2014.967897
发表时间: 2015-05-27
期刊: LEISURE SCIENCES
影响因子: 4
作者:
Chick, Garry;Hsu, Yi-Chung;Hsieh, Chi-Ming
通讯作者: Hsieh, Chi-Ming