The time and space of everyday life
The time and space of everyday life
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/0950238042000201491
复制
发表时间：
2004-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Burkitt, I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burkitt, I
本文认为，日常生活与所有社会关系和活动有关，既包括编纂和规范化的“官方”实践，也包括经验的“非官方”实践和表达。事实上，日常生活被视为内在的单一层面，这两种形式的实践和表达相互联系，相互影响。日常生活的生活经验是多维的，由不同的社会实践领域组成，这些实践领域在不同程度上以不同的方式（官方或非官方）被表达、编纂和规范化。在日常生活中穿过这些领域，我们会意识到穿越不同的时间和空间区域。日常关系和实践的某些方面对政府、制度化和官方法典化更开放，而其他方面则更有抵抗力，并为反对派和社会运动提供了基础。日常生活是各种不同的、不同的生产和表达形式的混合体，每一种形式都以独特的方式结合了时间和空间。我们所说的与国家或经济相关的“制度”，是在时间和空间上固定社会实践的尝试——将其包含在特定的地理地点，并将其编纂在官方话语中。与日常生活更相关的关系和实践，如友谊、爱情、同志关系和交流关系，在时间和空间上更加流动、开放和分散。然而，在社会分析中，这两者不应该分开，因为它们在社会和政治变革过程中必然是相互关联的。这在当代资本主义中尤其如此，或者如列斐伏尔所说，“控制消费的官僚社会”。
This article argues that everyday life is related to all social relations and activities, including both the 'official' practices that are codified and normalized and the 'unofficial' practices and articulations of experience. Indeed, everyday day life is seen as the single plane of immanence in which these two forms of practice and articulation interrelate and affect one another. The lived experience of everyday life is multidimensional, composed of various social fields of practice that are articulated, codified and normalized to different degrees and in different ways (either officially or unofficially). Moving through these fields in daily life, we are aware of passing through different zones of time and space. There are aspects of everyday relations and practices more open to government, institutionalization, and official codification, while others are more resistant and provide the basis for opposition and social movements. Everyday life is a mixture of diverse and differentially produced and articulated forms, each combining time and space in a unique way. What we refer to as 'institutions' associated with the state or the economy are attempts to fix social practice in time and space - to contain it in specific geographical sites and codify it in official discourses. The relations and practices more often associated with everyday life - such as friendship, love, comradeship and relations of communication - are more fluid, open and dispersed across time and space. However, the two should not be uncoupled in social analysis, as they are necessarily interrelated in processes of social and political change. This is especially so in contemporary capitalism or, as Lefebvre called it, the 'bureaucratic society of controlled consumption'.