Patterned Inequality?
Patterned Inequality?
复制标题
模式化的不平等？
DOI：
10.1177/004208169402900402
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Ittipone Tunyavong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Miranda;Ittipone Tunyavong
许多学者已经得出结论，官僚决策规则最能解释城市服务分布。这些研究导致了城市政治中的传统智慧，即专业精神主导着市政机构的日常工作，因此不太可能发生系统性偏见。在这项研究中，作者表明，未形成模式的不平等命题导致学者低估了地方政治在解释服务分配方面的重要性。通过研究近二十年来芝加哥社区发展整体赠款和基本建设改善计划资金的分配，他们得出结论，选举和政权政治也对谁从市政府得到什么产生决定性影响。
Numerous scholars have concluded that bureaucratic decision rules best explain urban service distributions. These studies have led to a conventional wisdom in urban politics that professionalism dominates municipal agency routines to the extent that systematic bias is therefore unlikely to occur. In this study, the authors demonstrate that the unpatterned inequality thesis has led scholars to underestimate the importance of local politics in explaining service distribution. By examining the allocation of community development block grant and capital improvement plan funds in Chicago over nearly two decades, they conclude that electoral and regime politics also exercise a decisive impact on who gets what from city government.