Reasoning about others' reasoning
Reasoning about others' reasoning
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010
复制
发表时间：
2013-05-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Almeida, Tiago
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mata, Andre;Fiedler, Klaus;Almeida, Tiago
人们在评估别人的推理时是否更倾向于进行批判性思维？这种推理能力的增强是否反映了他们认为其他人比自己更容易有偏见（偏见盲点，BBS）？在三项研究中，显示BBS的参与者能够更好地检测推理偏差，并且当他们被要求检查据说来自其他人的反应时，他们在推理问题中的表现比当这些相同的反应不归因于其他人时更好。没有展示BBS的参与者倾向于做相反的事情。这种模式被发现是由于BBS参与者在检查其他人的回答时，比在没有社会背景的情况下进行更深思熟虑的思考（研究2）。此外，由推理他人的推理所导致的更好或更差的表现转移到随后的不相关问题（研究3）。(c)2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Are people more likely to engage in critical thinking when assessing others' reasoning? And does this reasoning enhancement reflect their belief that others are more likely to be biased than themselves (the bias blind spot, BBS)? In three studies, participants who displayed BBS were better able to detect reasoning biases and performed better in reasoning problems when they were asked to examine responses that were said to come from other people than when those same responses were not attributed to other people. Participants who did not display BBS tended to do the opposite. This pattern was found to result from BBS participants engaging in more deliberate thinking when examining the responses of other people than when those answers are not given a social context (Study 2). Moreover, the better or worse performance that resulted from reasoning about others' reasoning transferred to subsequent unrelated problems (Study 3). (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.