Transnational Muslim solidarities and everyday life
Transnational Muslim solidarities and everyday life
复制标题
跨国穆斯林团结和日常生活
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00459.x
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
P. Mandaville
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Mandaville
摘要。关于全球化和身份认同的讨论集中在各种后国家归属框架的新相关性上，包括穆斯林乌玛。本文反对乌玛已经构成当代穆斯林关于身份或全球化政治意识形式的辩论中的主要指涉的想法。此外，“后伊斯兰主义”的出现意味着伊斯兰政治动员很少寻求在民族国家的容器内建立替代政治秩序。然而，这并不意味着我们看到今天在穆斯林背景下对国家的重申。相反，跨国穆斯林团结代表了一个隶属关系和社会政治动员的中间空间，与民族国家并存，并处于一种矛盾的关系中。我指出了两个不同的社会宗教运动，它们在没有设定乌玛/伊斯兰身份的首要性或排他性的情况下，表达了伊斯兰教与民族之间关系的不同愿景：（1）Fethullah Gulen运动，它同时作为新奥斯曼土耳其民族主义的特定愿景和对凯末尔主义国家秩序的批评的载体;（2）新萨拉菲斯特运动，在这里被解读为将公共道德和问责制的概念嵌入正统伊斯兰教的话语传统而不是现代政体的制度框架中的努力。
ABSTRACT. Discussions of globalisation and identity have focused on the renewed relevance of various post-national frameworks of belonging, including the Muslim umma. This article argues against the idea that the umma has come to constitute a primary referent in contemporary Muslim debates about identity or a form of globalised political consciousness. Furthermore, the advent of ‘post-Islamism’ means that Islamic political mobilisation rarely seeks to establish alternative political orders within the container of the nation-state. However, this does not mean that we are seeing a reaffirmation of the nation in Muslim contexts today. Rather, transnational Muslim solidarities represent an intermediate space of affiliation and socio-political mobilisation that exists alongside and in an ambivalent relationship with the nation-state. I point to two different socio-religious movements that, without positing the primacy or exclusivity of the umma/Islamic identity, express discrepant visions of the relationship between Islam and the nation: (1) the Fethullah Gulen movement, which serves simultaneously as the vehicle for a particular vision of neo-Ottoman Turkish nationalism and a critique of the Kemalist national order; and (2) the neo-Salafist movement, read here as an effort to embed conceptions of public morality and accountability within the discursive tradition of orthodox Islam rather than the institutional framework of modern polity.