THE MOBILIZATION OF SOCIAL SUPPORTS - SOME INDIVIDUAL CONSTRAINTS
THE MOBILIZATION OF SOCIAL SUPPORTS - SOME INDIVIDUAL CONSTRAINTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/bf00896802
复制
发表时间：
1983-01-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
ECKENRODE, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ECKENRODE, J
本研究考察了控制源和求助信念两个倾向变量以及社会人口统计变量对社会支持动员的影响。以社区卫生中心的308名女性使用者为样本，收集了前一年内发生的应激事件后社会支持接触的信息。结果证实了两个倾向变量的重要性，内部控制点和对寻求帮助的好处的积极信念与更多的支持动员有关，与可用的潜在支持者数量无关。此外，受访者的教育程度与支持动员呈直接正相关关系。对交互作用的测试揭示了社会人口统计变量和倾向变量或潜在支持之间的几个交互作用。这些交互作用一般表明，倾向变量和潜在支持的水平对高教育成就、高收入或来自英语(与西班牙语)背景的人的支持动员有更大的影响。这项研究得到了国家卫生服务研究中心(HS03029)和威廉·T·格兰特基金会(82081)的资助。我要感谢罗杰·米切尔和两位匿名的评论者提供的有用的评论，感谢亚瑟·索博尔在计算机分析方面的帮助。
The effects of two dispositional variables, locus of control and help-seeking beliefs, as well as sociodemographic variables, on the mobilization of social supports were examined in this study. With a sample of 308 women users of a neighborhood health center, information was gathered regarding social support contacts following stressful events occurring within the previous year. Results confirmed the importance of the two dispositional variables, with internal locus of control and positive beliefs in the benefits of helpseeking each being associated with more support mobilization, independent of the number of potential supporters available. In addition, the educational level of the respondents showed a direct, positive relationship to support mobilization. Tests for interactions revealed several interactions between sociodemographic variables and the dispositional variables or potential support. These interactions generally showed that the dispositional variables and levels of potential support had a greater impact on support mobilization for persons with higher educational achievement, higher incomes, or coming from English-speaking (vs. Spanish-speaking) backgrounds. Results are discussed in relation to current research On Social support and differential vulnerability of individuals to the effects of stress." This research was supported by grants from the National Center for Health Services Research (HS03029) and the William T. Grant Foundation (82081). I would like to thank Roger Mitchell and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and Arthur Sobol for his assistance with the computer analyses.