Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities

Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities
复制标题

DOI:
10.1017/s1368980012003540
复制
发表时间:
2013-05-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Haukkala, Ari
Haukkala, Ari
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Konttinen, Hanna;Sarlio-Lahteenkorva, Sirpa;Haukkala, Ari

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:低社会经济地位(SES)与不健康的饮食习惯有关,但原因尚不清楚。我们研究了各种食物选择动机的绝对或相对重要性是否有助于SES的差距在蔬菜/水果和能量密集的foodintake.Design:我们分析了横截面数据从FINRISK研究2007年通过结构方程模型和使用缩短版本的食物选择问卷,以评估健康,快乐,方便,价格,熟悉和道德动机的绝对重要性。我们通过将参与者对每个动机的评分除以他/她对所有动机的平均得分来计算每个动机的相对重要性。膳食摄入量用FFQ测量。设置:芬兰的一项基于人群的调查。对象:男性(n 1691)和女性(n 2059),年龄25-64岁。结果:更高的教育和收入与更大的蔬菜/水果摄入量相关(β =0.12,P
Objective: A low socio-economic status (SES) is related to less healthy dietary habits, but the reasons for this remain unclear. We examined whether the absolute or relative importance of various food choice motives contributed to SES disparities in vegetable/fruit and energy-dense food intake.Design: We analysed cross-sectional data from the FINRISK Study 2007 by means of structural equation modelling and used a shortened version of the Food Choice Questionnaire to assess the absolute importance of health, pleasure, convenience, price, familiarity and ethicality motives. We calculated the relative importance of each motive by dividing the participant's rating of it by his/her mean score on all motives. Dietary intake was measured with an FFQ.Setting: A population-based survey in Finland.Subjects: Men (n 1691) and women (n 2059) aged 25-64 years.Results: Higher education and income were related to a greater vegetable/fruit intake (beta=0.12, P