Strategies for efficiency and accuracy in gene expression
Strategies for efficiency and accuracy in gene expression
复制标题
基因表达效率和准确性的策略
DOI:
10.1016/0968-0004(87)90060-0
复制
发表时间:
1987
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
C. Kurland
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Kurland
Recently there has been a sh~ m the perception of problems assoaated with the mechanisms of gene expression Formerly it seemed that the problem i~. s to da'cover where the remarkable accuracy of gene expresaon ongmated The my~ tery i~ s that all model systemstudtes suggested that the binding mterac~ ons ofnucleoades are not suflfiaen@ stereo-speafic to support the aca~ racy ofather IranscnpRon or oftranslaa~ z The maodactlon of the Hopfield-Niruo model of substrate proofreading demysafied ltm aspect of the accuracy of gene expression, but tt generated another set of problems Thus, the way to get/ugh accuracy out of a low fidehty elementary process such as base pmnng: s to repeat the elementary step a sufficient number of runes Since there is no pnnaple Imm on the nmnber of allowable repenaons, there ts no prmaple lunu on the auamable accuracy What then sets the error rates ofgene expre. sston~ This series of three arncles; i~ ll address this quesvon In this first aracle, the notch of a na2xmuzed kmeac effiaeney for the translaaon apparatus~ ll be introduced A sunple opnrruzanon prmaple wdl then be used as a tool to explore the consequences of using ckfferent coding sirategzes to speafy the sequences ofprotems that are etpressed selecavely under different growth condmons In the second aracle the antagomsac relat~ nshlp bea,, een lanenc c 3, and accuracy of translanon v~ dl be explored The nonon of a lanenc optm uzau. on of the cos~ of errors and the cos~ of accuracy wdl be mtrodaced and used to explain the growth phenotypes ofmutants with altered translanonal accurat 3, The costs assocurled w~ th errors of translocanon wdl be contrasted wtth those mst~ ated wch nusscnse errors m the thtrd aracle In addmon,! wdl introduce the notion that there ts a physical constraint m translaaon tl~: mposes a reoprocal relanonstnp between the accuracy of ammoacyl-tRNA selecnon and the accuracy of messenger RNA tnovemenl Th~ s reciprocal relaaottshtp wdl provtde some ms: ght mto the nature of drug dependence m bactena and,,~ ll also suggest the otahne.~ of an answer to our original queslton In paracular, I wdl suggest that the lower level of the nussense error rate ts determined, at least m pan, by the upper level of mRNA translocanon errors that~ tolerable Ltkeiwse, the accuracy of translocanon may be constrained by the laneac co~ assoaated with etcesstve accuracy of tRNA sdecnon