Can we model cultural ecosystem services, and are we measuring the right things?
Can we model cultural ecosystem services, and are we measuring the right things?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/pan3.10271
复制
发表时间：
2021-10
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Laurence Jones;M. Boeri;M. Christie;I. Durance;K. Evans;D. Fletcher;Laura J Harrison;Anna Jorgensen;D. Masante;J. McGinlay;D. M. Paterson;R. Schmucki;C. Short;Natalie Small;Georgina E. Southon;T. Stojanovic;R. Waters
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Laurence Jones;M. Boeri;M. Christie;I. Durance;K. Evans;D. Fletcher;Laura J Harrison;Anna Jorgensen;D. Masante;J. McGinlay;D. M. Paterson;R. Schmucki;C. Short;Natalie Small;Georgina E. Southon;T. Stojanovic;R. Waters
1.文化生态系统服务是自然对人类贡献的一个关键方面，仍然是纳入决策的一个挑战。一个促成因素是难以界定和描述这些因素，部分原因是：对驱使人们与自然互动的因素缺乏了解，缺乏适当的数据来量化这些互动，以及在衡量和模拟有助于解释人们行动的一系列复杂的社会、心理和行为属性方面存在基本困难。2.在这项研究中，我们提出了一个框架，发展的概念，文化资本，社会资本和人力资本的具体形式，以人为本的资本，在他们的背景下的贡献，理解消费电子商务。每种形式的资本都包含受益人的不同属性。3.用一项独立的跨学科研究的数据对该框架进行了测试，结果表明该框架很容易适用于特定情况。一种文化资本的衡量标准，生态中心主义，比一套七个人口变量解释了更多的变化。4.应用该框架还表明，尽管使用了广泛的统计变量，但观察到的很大一部分变化仍然无法解释。这表明，需要做更多的工作来理解和制定衡量标准，以衡量人们与自然接触的动机背后的其他因素。该框架适用于其他类型的生态系统服务，也可能有助于探索关系价值。
1. Cultural ecosystem services (CES), a key aspect of nature's contributions to people, remain a challenge to incorporate into decision making. One contributing factor is the difficulty of defining and describing these, due partly to: ongoing poor under standing of what drives people to interact with nature, a lack of appropriate data to quantify these interactions, and basic difficulties in measuring and modelling the complex array of social, psychological and behavioural attributes which help explain people's actions. 2. In this study we present a framework which develops the concepts of cultural capital, social capital and human capital as specific forms of human- centred capi -tal, in the context of their contribution to understanding CES. Each form of capital encompasses separate attributes of beneficiaries. 3. Testing the framework with data from a separate trans- disciplinary study illus-trated that the framework was readily applicable to specific situations. A measure of cultural capital, EcoCentrism, explained more variation than a suite of seven demographic variables. 4. Applying the framework also showed that despite using a wide range of explana tory variables, a large proportion of observed variation remained unaccounted for. This suggests that more work is needed to understand and to develop metrics which can measure additional factors which underlie peoples’ motivations to engage with nature. The framework is applicable to other types of ecosystem service, and may also be useful for exploring relational values.