Addressing the Gendered Interests of Victims/Survivors of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence and Their Children Through National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security

Addressing the Gendered Interests of Victims/Survivors of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence and Their Children Through National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security
复制标题

通过妇女、和平与安全国家行动计划解决与冲突有关的性暴力受害者/幸存者及其子女的性别利益

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Swaine
A. Swaine
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Swaine

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

人们越来越认识到需要解决与冲突有关的性暴力的影响,而对与冲突有关的生殖和孕产妇伤害以及战争中出生的儿童的认识较少。受害者/幸存者及其子女都有一套错综复杂的共同和独特的利益,但这些利益仍未得到满足。《妇女、和平与安全国家行动计划》为弥补这些差距提供了机会。本文探讨了《国家行动计划-妇女和儿童福利方案》在多大程度上对儿童、儿童和青少年受害者/幸存者及其子女的具体权利和性别利益作出了回应?它推动了关于和平与安全性别规划的思考,并作出了三项重要的分析贡献:“影响和损失类型”,促进了对CRSV的理解;“性别利益分析”框架,确定了受害者/幸存者及其子女的实际和战略性别利益;并应用这些框架,对印度尼西亚、尼泊尔、菲律宾和东帝汶的国家行动方案-WPS进行批判性分析。它认为,《妇女和方案支助计划》的规划未能确保提供多部门服务,而生殖和孕产问题以及生物和毒素武器问题在选定的《妇女和方案支助计划》国家行动方案中完全被忽视。文章讨论了这些调查结果的影响,通过国家行动方案,妇女和儿童福利部的性别规划前进。
There is growing acknowledgement of the need to address the impacts of conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV), with less recognition of conflict-related reproductive and maternal harms and children born of war (CBW). An intricate set of common as well as distinctive interests arise for both victims/survivors and their children that remain unfulfilled. National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security (NAPs-WPS) present an opportunity to redress these gaps. This article examines to what extent are NAPs-WPS responsive to the specific rights and gendered interests of victims/survivors of CRSV and their children? It advances thinking on gender planning for peace and security and makes three significant analytical contributions: a ‘Typology of Impacts and Losses’ advancing understanding of CRSV; a ‘Gender Interests Analysis’ framework, identifying the practical and strategic gender interests of victims/survivors and their children; and application of these frameworks to produce a critical analysis of the NAPs-WPS of Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines and Timor-Leste. It finds that planning under WPS is failing to ensure that multi-sectoral services are available, while reproductive and maternity issues and CBW are completely neglected in the selected NAPs-WPS. The article discusses the implications of these findings for gender planning through NAPs-WPS going forward.