Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs
Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs
复制标题
开放获取、大型期刊和 MOOC
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richard Wellen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richard Wellen
“开放”学术内容的发展得到了高等教育和学术出版领域许多倡导者、分析家、利益相关者和改革者的大力支持和推动。两项最著名的发展是开放获取学术出版和大规模在线开放课程（MOOC），每一项都与新技术实现的颠覆性创新有关。对这些新的知识交流模式的支持与预期有关，即它们将促进一些公共利益，包括扩大学术工作的影响、生产力和形式;改革高等教育和学术出版市场;减轻学术界的一些成本压力。本文探讨了英国和美国迅速出现的政策举措，以促进开放的内容，并带来了市场和学术公地之间的新关系。在此过程中，我研究了有争议的学术分拆形式，如开放获取的大型期刊和MOOC，并将其置于高等教育领域新监管制度对生产力和影响力的高度重视的背景下。
The development of “open” academic content has been strongly embraced and promoted by many advocates, analysts, stakeholders, and reformers in the sector of higher education and academic publishing. The two most well-known developments are open access scholarly publishing and Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs), each of which are connected to disruptive innovations enabled by new technologies. Support for these new modes of exchanging knowledge is linked to the expectation that they will promote a number of public interest benefits, including widening the impact, productivity, and format of academic work; reforming higher education and scholarly publishing markets; and relieving some of the cost pressures in academia. This article examines the rapid emergence of policy initiatives in the United Kingdom and the United States to promote open content and to bring about a new relationship between the market and the academic commons. In doing so, I examine controversial forms of academic unbundling such as open access megajournals and MOOCs and place each in the context of the heightened emphasis on productivity and impact in new regulatory regimes in the area of higher education.