Participation, power and beliefs shape local food and nutrition policy.

Participation, power and beliefs shape local food and nutrition policy.
复制标题

参与、权力和信仰塑造了当地的粮食和营养政策。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
Journal of NutriLife
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Katherine Asher
Katherine Asher
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Pelletier;C. McCullum;V. Kraak;Katherine Asher

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

据认为,社区参与有许多好处,包括将当地知识纳入规划,为当地行动提供更大的支持和可持续性,并符合民主价值观。这些声称的好处在纽约北部进行了检查,在那里的6个社区中的每一个都召开了三维参与式规划活动,重点是当地粮食系统的预期变化。使用各种定性和定量方法评估以下内容:1)规划活动前后与食品和食品系统相关的当地价值观、利益和信仰(观点); 2)议程设置的公平性和有效性; 3)活动后2年内的行动实施情况。尽管观点有很大差异,但与会者在活动期间对当地粮食系统的预期变化达成了一致,他们认为这一过程是一次公平和积极的经历。然而,行动议程、后续行动和事件后观点的变化显示出偏离所揭示的共同利益或被剥夺权利的参与者利益的系统性趋势。这反映了在活动期间和活动之后参与的公平性和有效性方面的差异,地方机构的既定议程和偏好以及各种市场和监管障碍。
Community participation is believed to hold a number of benefits, including the incorporation of local knowledge in planning, generation of greater support for and sustainability of local actions and being consistent with democratic values. These claimed benefits were examined in upstate New York, where 3-d participatory planning events were convened in each of six communities, focusing on desired changes in the local food system. A variety of qualitative and quantitative methods were used to assess the following: 1) local values, interests and beliefs (viewpoints) related to food and the food system before and after the planning events; 2) fairness and effectiveness in agenda setting; and 3) implementation of actions during the 2 y following the events. Despite marked variation in viewpoints, participants readily agreed on desired changes in the local food system during the events and they considered the process to be a fair and positive experience. However, the action agendas, follow-up actions and changes in viewpoints after the events displayed systematic tendencies to deviate from revealed common interests or interests of disenfranchised participants. This reflected differences in the fairness and effectiveness of participation during and after the events, established agendas and preferences of local institutions and a variety of market and regulatory barriers.