"I Don't Want Someone to Watch Me While I'm Working": Gendered Views of Facial Recognition Technology in Workplace Surveillance
"I Don't Want Someone to Watch Me While I'm Working": Gendered Views of Facial Recognition Technology in Workplace Surveillance
复制标题
“我不想在工作时有人监视我”：工作场所监控中面部识别技术的性别观点
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Anthony
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Luke Stark;Amanda C. Stanhaus;D. Anthony
雇主越来越多地使用信息和通信技术来监控员工。这种工作场所监视在美国很普遍，但其经验和潜在后果因性别而异。因此，我们试图确定自我报告的男性和女性员工在他们认为使用配备面部识别技术（FRT）的工作场所摄像头的可接受程度上是否存在差异，并更普遍地研究隐私态度在调解工作场所监控方面的作用。使用皮尤研究中心进行的全国代表性调查的数据，我们发现女性比男性更不可能赞成在工作场所使用使用FRT相机。然后，我们进一步探讨男性和女性是否对隐私有不同的看法，以及隐私的看法是否会缓和性别与工作场所监控批准之间的关系。最后，我们考虑这些研究结果的隐私和通过嵌入式技术的监控的影响，以及如何监控和技术，如FRT的后果可能是性别。注：我们认识到，基于二元性别定义的评价总是不公正和排斥性的。正如我们在讨论这项研究的局限性时所指出的，我们受到了皮尤提供的调查类别的限制。
Employers are increasingly using information and communication technologies to monitor employees. Such workplace surveillance is extensive in the United States, but its experience and potential consequences differ across groups based on gender. We thus sought to identify whether self‐reported male and female employees differ in the extent to which they find the use of workplace cameras equipped with facial recognition technology (FRT) acceptable, and examine the role of privacy attitudes more generally in mediating views on workplace surveillance. Using data from a nationally representative survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, we find that women are much less likely than men to approve of the use of cameras using FRT in the workplace. We then further explore whether men and women think differently about privacy, and if perceptions of privacy moderate the relationship between gender and approval of workplace surveillance. Finally, we consider the implications of these findings for privacy and surveillance via embedded technologies, and how the consequences of surveillance and technologies like FRT may be gendered. Note: We recognize evaluations based on a binary definition of gender are invariably partial and exclusionary. As we note in our discussion of the study’s limitations, we were constrained by the survey categories provided by Pew.
DOI：
10.1002/asi.24232
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Wu, Philip Fei;Vitak, Jessica;Zimmer, Michael T.
通讯作者：
Zimmer, Michael T.