An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception
An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception
复制标题
两种政治感知理论的实证检验
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tim Nanneman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Granberg;Jeff A. Kasmer;Tim Nanneman
万斯我们对这一现象的理解。本文介绍了这些理论，并通过推导和测试每个理论的独特假设来分析它们的鲁棒性。位移理论政治知觉的位移理论起源于态度对社会判断过程的影响的研究，即，情感对认知的影响（Sherif and Hovland 1~61; Sherif，Sherif，and Nebergall 1965）。在这项研究中，通信者的身份是未指明的。同化（在人自己的态度的方向上的沟通的位置的感知扭曲）是预期的沟通时，至少适度模糊，并在人的接受范围内。对比（感知扭曲的沟通远离自己的态度的位置）是预期的沟通是适度的模棱两可，并在人的拒绝范围内。没有系统的位移效应，预计一个明确的沟通，和普遍的同化效应，预计在感知一个高度模糊的沟通。尽管同化和对比最初是在心理物理判断中观察到的，但自我参与后来被认为是一个重要因素。同化和
vance our understanding of this phenomenon. This article describes these theories and analyzes their robustness by deriving and testing distinctive hypotheses from each theory. Displacement theory. The displacement theory of political perception originated in studies of the effect of attitude on social judgment processes i.e., the effect of affect on cognition (Sherif and Hovland 1~61; Sherif, Sherif, and Nebergall 1965). In this research, the identity of the communicator was unspecified. Assimilation (perceptual distortion of the position of the communication in the direction of the person’s own attitude) was expected when the communication was at least moderately ambiguous and fell within the person’s latitude of acceptance. Contrast (perceptual distortion of the position of the communication away from the person’s own attitude) was expected when the communication was moderately ambiguous and fell within the person’s latitude of rejection. No systematic displacement effect was anticipated for an unambiguous communication, and a pervasive assimilation effect was expected in perception of a highly ambiguous communication. Even though assimilation and contrast were first observed in psychophysical judgments, egoinvolvement was later posited as an important factor. Assimilation and