A Chinese Internet? History, practice, and globalization
A Chinese Internet? History, practice, and globalization
复制标题
中国互联网?
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Guobin Yang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guobin Yang
In studying the impact of television on American journalism and the presidency, Michael Schudson (1995) writes that the question is not about television as an abstract technology, but about American television as a cultural institution and form. The ways in which a new technology is used depend on preexisting conventions and social relations. Thus television in the United States both absorbs conventions of news reporting from the past and develops new conventions. It influences American journalism and politics by providing forms of narration and representation. In this sense, there is no television as such, but only “this television, our television” (Schudson, 1995, p. 54). Can we speak of the Chinese Internet in the same way that Schudson speaks of American television? There are obvious differences between television and the Internet. Television channels are limited in any region of the world, while the Internet is arguably the most global of contemporary media technologies. I will argue, however, that the Internet in China has become domesticated to the extent that it is now possible, even necessary, to talk about the Chinese Internet, as opposed to the Internet in China. “Domesticated” heremeans “localized”more than “tamed”. “Localized”, however, does notmean that the Chinese Internet is not global or that it has become an intranet. It still has global features, and yet it has assumed distinctly Chinese characteristics. The Chinese Internet is a cultural form much like American television, or British television for that matter. Internet as a cultural form refers to the various types of network services, user practices, and genres of writing, such as YouTube videos and blogs. These are used differently in different societies and necessarily carry the imprints of their users.