Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK
Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001
复制
发表时间：
2008-10-01
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Sonnino, Roberta
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Marsden, Terry;Sonnino, Roberta
在新兴的农村发展范式下，我们认为，要成为多功能的活动必须为农业增加收入，它必须有助于建设一个与更广泛社会的需求相对应的新的农业部门导致更广泛的农村发展利益。通过根据他们是否试图符合这些条件来评估英国农村政策，本文表明，对农业多功能性角色的隐性认识是通过从部门转向区域和领土的转变而发生的，这些角色将农业重新整合到农村地区。发展。但是，在实践中，尤其是在英国，英国政府无法将多功能活动变成真正的农村发展选择。实际上，通过一方面继续支持农业/工业/零售商的利益，另一方面，后来的环境和便利息 - 另一方面，国家主要是通过建立竞争性组织的“项目”和继续进行的计划来进行管理。证明分配给农业的资源的集中度（和限制）。基于对过去十年政策发展的批评，本文强调了对国家创新的更具创新形式的需求，为农业食品中的新，创造性和空间上嵌入的供求管理形式提供了机会。在结论中，本文还认为，需要更批判性的研究来揭示政府和生产者网络在通过农业多功能方面进步的可持续农村发展中的现有和潜在作用。 （c）2008 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。
Under the emerging rural development paradigm, we argue that to be multifunctional an activity must add income to agriculture, it must contribute to the construction of a new agricultural sector that corresponds to the needs of the wider society and it must reconfigure rural resources in ways that lead to wider rural development benefits. By evaluating UK rural policies on the basis of whether or not they attempt to meet these conditions, this paper shows that an implicit recognition of agriculture's multifunctional character has occurred recently through the shift from a sectoral to a regional and territorial perspective that reintegrates farming into rural development. However, in practice, and especially in England, the UK government has been unable to turn Multifunctional activities into a real rural development option. in fact, by continuing to support agri-industrial/retailer interests on the one hand, and post-productivist-environmental and amenity- interests on the other, the State is governing mostly by setting up competitively organized 'projects' and schemes that continue to justify the concentration (and limitation) of resources allocated to agriculture. Based upon a critique of policy developments over the past decade, this paper emphasizes the need for more innovative forms of state innovation that provide opportunities for new, creative and more spatially embedded forms of supply and demand management in agri-food. In the conclusions, the paper also argues that more critical research is needed to uncover the existing and potential role of both governments and producer networks in progressing sustainable rural development through agricultural multifunctionality. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.