Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty

Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty
复制标题

本土数据、本土方法和本土数据主权

DOI:
10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Michele Suina
Michele Suina
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Walter;Michele Suina

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要自Tuhiwai Smith 1999年的开创性著作《非殖民化土著方法论》以来,土著方法论领域发展迅速。然而,在大多数情况下,明显缺乏定量方法,与土著方法相一致的方法主要是定性方法。这篇文章提出,土著数据生产中缺乏土著存在,导致了地球仪各地被剥夺土著人民的压倒性统计赤字。本文使用原住民生活世界的理论概念,建立在Walter和Andersen 2013年出版的《原住民定量方法论》一书的核心前提之上。文章论证了西方统计数据逻辑的根本性混乱,详细介绍了该领域的最新发展,包括土著数据主权运动的出现。本文还探讨了土著定量方法在实践中使用的案例研究部落流行病学中心在新墨西哥州。
ABSTRACT The field of Indigenous methodologies has grown strongly since Tuhiwai Smith’s 1999 groundbreaking book Decolonizing Indigenous Methodologies. For the most part however, there has been a marked absence of quantitative methodologies with the methods aligned with Indigenous methodologies predominantly qualitative. This article proposes that the absence of an Indigenous presence from Indigenous data production has resulted in an overwhelming statistical narrative of deficit for dispossessed Indigenous peoples around the globe. Using the theoretical concept of Indigenous Lifeworlds this article builds on the core premises of Walter and Andersen’s 2013 book Indigenous quantitative methodologies. Arguing for a fundamental disturbance of the Western logics of statistical data the article details recent developments in the field including the emergence of the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement. The article also explores Indigenous quantitative methodologies in practice using the case study of a Tribal Epidemiology Centre in New Mexico.