Language discordance in emergency department delirium screening: Results from a qualitative interview-based study.
Language discordance in emergency department delirium screening: Results from a qualitative interview-based study.
复制标题
急诊科谵妄筛查中的语言不一致：基于定性访谈的研究结果。
DOI：
10.1111/jgs.18147
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Kennedy,Maura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chary,AnitaN;Torres,Beatrice;Brickhouse,Elise;Santangelo,Ilianna;Godwin,KylerM;Naik,AanandD;Carpenter,ChristopherR;Liu,ShanW;Kennedy,Maura
方法我们对领导 ED 谵妄计划的卫生专业人员进行了 20 次半结构化定性访谈。我们通过向三个老年急诊医学组织的列表服务器发送电子邮件邀请来招募参与者；因此，无法确定答复率。我们询问受访者，当临床医生与患者语言不一致时，他们的急诊室如何筛查患者是否患有谵妄。访谈通过视频会议、录音和转录的方式进行。我们使用归纳方法分析了所有记录，其中从受访者收集的信息用于定义代码。 5 我们以协商一致的方式反复审查了共同主题的编码数据。 12次采访后，没有出现新的主题，表明数据饱和。
MethodsWe conducted 20 semi-structured qualitative interviews with health professionals leading ED delirium initiatives. We recruited participants through email invitations sent to list-servs of three geriatric emergency medicine organizations; as such, a response rate cannot be determined. We asked interviewees how their ED screens patients for delirium when there is clinician-patient language discordance. Interviews were conducted by videoconference, audio-recorded, and transcribed. We analyzed all transcripts using an inductive approach, in which information gathered from interviewees is used to define codes. 5 We iteratively reviewed coded data for common themes by consensus. After 12 interviews, no new themes emerged, indicating data saturation.