Resumption, Movement, and Derivational Economy

Resumption, Movement, and Derivational Economy
复制标题

复苏、运动和衍生经济

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
N. Hornstein
N. Hornstein
中科院分区:
人文科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Joseph E. Aoun;Lina Choueiri;N. Hornstein

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了恢复和运动之间的相互作用。黎巴嫩阿拉伯语区分了真正的恢复,其中代词或修饰语短语通过绑定与-先行词相关,而明显的恢复,其中代词或修饰语短语通过移动与其-先行词相关。只有明显的恢复显示范围和绑定的重建效果。强代名词和修饰语短语作为形容词,除非出现在岛屿内部,否则不能与数量先行词联系起来。我们解释这一客观要求如下:(一)(真)恢复是一个最后手段的设备,(B)强代词和修饰语短语在明显的恢复上下文产生的同位修饰语的DP,这是前面的一个位置,和(c)同位修饰语被解释为独立的条款。Obstanion被简化为量词不能跨越词的边界来约束代词成分。
This article investigates the interaction between resumption and movement. Lebanese Arabic distinguishes between true resumption, where a pronoun or an epithet phrase is related to an -antecedent via Bind, and apparent resumption, where the pronoun or the epithet phrase is related to its -antecedent via Move. Only apparent resumption displays reconstruction effects for scope and binding. As resumptives, strong pronouns and epithet phrases cannot be related to a quantificational antecedent unless they occur inside islands. We account for this Obviation Requirement as follows: (a) (true) resumption is a last resort device, (b) strong pronouns and epithet phrases in apparent resumption contexts are generated as appositive modifiers of a DP, which is fronted to an -position, and (c) appositive modifiers are interpreted as independent clauses. Obviation is reduced to the inability of quantifiers to bind a pronominal element across sentential boundaries.