Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10936-011-9191-1
复制
发表时间：
2012-10
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
DeDe, Gayle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DeDe, Gayle
本研究的目的是确定是否以及何时失语症患者和健康对照使用词汇和韵律信息在网上句子理解。失语症患者和对照组（每组n = 12）参加了自定进度的听力实验。刺激是早期结束句，如“当父母看着（，）孩子唱了一首歌。”词汇和韵律线索都被操纵。这些线索偏向于歧义名词短语的主语或宾语（the child）。因此，有两个一致的条件（其中词汇线索和韵律线索是一致的）和两个不一致的条件（其中词汇和韵律线索冲突）。结果表明，当提示相互冲突时，失语症患者对歧义名词短语（孩子）的听力时间更长，而不是一致的。对照组在句子的前面，在从属动词（watched或danced）上显示出效果。两组都显示出对主要动词（sang）进行再分析的证据。这些效应表明，失语症组是敏感的词汇和韵律线索，但使用它们的时间相对于控制组延迟。
The purpose of this study was to determine whether and when individuals with aphasia and healthy controls use lexical and prosodic information during on-line sentence comprehension. Individuals with aphasia and controls (n = 12 per group) participated in a self-paced listening experiment. The stimuli were early closure sentences, such as “While the parents watched(,) the child sang a song.” Both lexical and prosodic cues were manipulated. The cues were biased toward the subject- or object- of the ambiguous noun phrase (the child). Thus, there were two congruous conditions (in which both lexical cues and prosodic cues were consistent) and two incongruous conditions (in which lexical and prosodic cues conflicted). The results showed that the people with aphasia had longer listening times for the ambiguous noun phrase (the child) when the cues were conflicting, rather than consistent. The controls showed effects earlier in the sentence, at the subordinate verb (watched or danced). Both groups showed evidence of reanalysis at the main verb (sang). These effects demonstrate that the aphasic group was sensitive to the lexical and prosodic cues, but used them on a delayed time course relative to the control group.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Baum, SR;Dwivedi, VD
通讯作者：
Dwivedi, VD
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
CAPLAN, D;BAKER, C;DEHAUT, F
通讯作者：
DEHAUT, F
DOI：
10.3758/bf03204507
发表时间：
1993-05-01
期刊：
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS
影响因子：
--
作者：
COHEN, J;MACWHINNEY, B;PROVOST, J
通讯作者：
PROVOST, J
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Gahl, S;Menn, L;Audrey, LH
通讯作者：
Audrey, LH
影响因子：
2
作者：
HAARMANN, HJ;KOLK, HHJ
通讯作者：
KOLK, HHJ