Utopie und Lebenszeit in der Aufklärung
Utopie und Lebenszeit in der Aufklärung
复制标题
启蒙运动中的乌托邦和一生
DOI：
10.1163/18796583-12340035
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
Oliver Bach
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver Bach
本文的目的是概述Hans Blumenberg的生命和世界时间概念（Lebenszeit und Weltzeit，1986）如何有助于阐明乌托邦文学及其世纪发展的一个实质性问题：乌托邦总是试图说明一个政治共同体的单个成员如何与作为一个整体的共同体和谐相处。私人善与公共善、私人利益与公共利益、私人意志与公意的和谐是世纪政治哲学的一个主要任务。然而，布卢门伯格的书让我们关注这种和谐的存在维度：在什么情况下，个体成员在他们的一生中会变得如此明智和善良，以至于他们总是知道并遵守共同利益？18世纪世纪的乌托邦理论似乎在道德感、常识和美育理论中找到了答案。本文旨在概述布鲁门伯格的生命和世界时间概念是如何形成的《生活时代与世界时代》（Lebenszeit und Weltzeit，1986）有助于阐明乌托邦文学及其从16世纪到18世纪世纪发展的一个实质性问题：乌托邦总是试图说明一个政治共同体的单个成员如何与整个共同体和谐相处。私人善与公共善、私人利益与公共利益、私人意志与公意的和谐是世纪政治哲学的一个主要任务。然而，布卢门伯格的书让我们关注这种和谐的存在维度：在什么情况下，个体成员在他们的一生中会变得如此明智和善良，以至于他们总是知道并遵守共同利益？18世纪世纪的乌托邦似乎在道德感、常识和美育理论中找到了答案。
The aim of this article is to outline how Hans Blumenberg’s conception of lifetime and world time (Lebenszeit und Weltzeit, 1986) can help to elucidate a substantial problem of utopian literature and its development from the 16 th to the 18 th century: utopias always try to illustrate the ways by which the single members of a political community harmonise with the community as a whole. The congruence of private good and common good, private interest and common interest, private will and general will is a main task of 17 th and 18 th century political philosophy. Blumenberg’s book, however, allows us to focus on the existential dimension of this harmonisation: under which circumstances may the single members become so wise and virtuous within their lifetimes that they always know about and comply with the common good? 18 th century utopias seem to find answers to this question in theories of moral sense, common sense and aesthetic education.AbstractThe aim of this article is to outline how Hans Blumenberg’s conception of lifetime and world time (Lebenszeit und Weltzeit, 1986) can help to elucidate a substantial problem of utopian literature and its development from the 16 th to the 18 th century: utopias always try to illustrate the ways by which the single members of a political community harmonise with the community as a whole. The congruence of private good and common good, private interest and common interest, private will and general will is a main task of 17 th and 18 th century political philosophy. Blumenberg’s book, however, allows us to focus on the existential dimension of this harmonisation: under which circumstances may the single members become so wise and virtuous within their lifetimes that they always know about and comply with the common good? 18 th century utopias seem to find answers to this question in theories of moral sense, common sense and aesthetic education.