How many Gs are there in ‘global governance’ after the crisis? The perspectives of the ‘marginal majority’ of the world's states
How many Gs are there in ‘global governance’ after the crisis? The perspectives of the ‘marginal majority’ of the world's states
复制标题
危机后的“全球治理”有多少G？世界“边缘大多数”国家的观点？
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00908.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
A. Payne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Payne
G20峰会最近已成为全球治理的主导机构。它声称其经济影响力和广泛的成员资格使其对全球经济和金融体系的管理具有高度的合法性和影响力。但 G20 仍然将大约 150 个其他国家排除在成员资格之外，所有这些国家在当代全球治理的框架内都面临着利益攸关的问题。在金融领域，这些被排除在外的国家为2009年6月举行的联合国会议提出的应对全球金融危机的替代议程作出了重大贡献。在贸易领域，它们在所谓的多哈回合期间广泛参与了世界贸易组织内的各种联盟，并在阻止达成一项在它们看来并不令人满意的协议方面发挥了作用。由于许多其他国家在 G20 职权范围之外积极发出声音，人们对 G20 的合法性提出了质疑，可以预期，被排除在外的“G150”将在未来几年内越来越多地探索与 G20 成员接触的不同方式。
The G20 summit has recently emerged as the dominant agency of global governance. It claims that its economic weight and broad membership give it a high degree of legitimacy and influence over the management of the global economy and financial system. But the G20 still excludes from membership some 150 other countries, all of which have interests at stake within the contours of contemporary global governance. In the financial arena these excluded countries contributed significantly to the alternative agenda for dealing with the global financial crisis proposed by the United Nations conference that met in June 2009. In the trade arena they engaged extensively in a variety of coalitions within the World Trade Organization during the so-called Doha Round and played a part in preventing a deal emerging that was unsatisfactory from their perspective. Questions are raised about the legitimacy of the G20 by the active presence of so many other country voices outside its remit and it can be expected that the excluded ‘G150’ will increasingly explore different ways to engage with the members of the G20 over the next few years.