DEVELOPING, SUSTAINING, AND MAXIMIZING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: AN INTEGRATIVE, DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS

DEVELOPING, SUSTAINING, AND MAXIMIZING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: AN INTEGRATIVE, DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS
复制标题

DOI:
10.5465/annals.2016.0045
复制
发表时间:
2018-06-01
影响因子:
21.2
通讯作者:
Salas, Eduardo
Salas, Eduardo
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shuffler, Marissa L.;Diazgranados, Deborah;Salas, Eduardo

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

组织经常进行重大投资,以确保他们的团队能够通过旨在支持其有效性的干预措施蓬勃发展。这种团队发展干预措施从实际和经验的角度都证明了其价值,使团队能够尽量减少错误,最大限度地利用专门知识,从而促进组织收益。然而,仔细检查,TDI文献的现状似乎是如此零碎,现有的科学证据的鲁棒性往往丢失。因此,我们试图提供一个更有凝聚力和动态整合的TDI文献,发展思想的TDI朝着一个系统的干预措施,可以优化。借鉴现有的理论和实证文献,我们首先广义定义TDI。然后,我们深入研究了最常见的TDI类型,总结了围绕每个TDI的科学状态。基于这一审查,我们区分功能,使一个有效的TDI。然后,我们提出了一个更具综合性的框架,旨在突出某些干预措施,最适合解决团队中的某些问题。总之,我们提倡将这种强大而脱节的TDI文献发展成为一种更具整体性,动态性和故意性的行动科学,并具有明确的经验和实践指导和方向。
Organizations regularly make significant investments to ensure their teams will thrive, through interventions intended to support their effectiveness. Such team development interventions (TDIs) have demonstrated their value from both a practical and empirical view, through enabling teams to minimize errors and maximize expertise and thereby advance organizational gains. Yet, on closer examination, the current state of the TDI literature appears so piecemeal that the robustness of extant scientific evidence is often lost. Accordingly, we seek to provide a more cohesive and dynamic integration of the TDI literature, evolving thinking about TDIs toward a system of interventions that can be optimized. Drawing on the existing theoretical and empirical literatures, we first broadly define TDIs. We then offer an in-depth look at the most common types of TDIs, in terms of summarizing the state of the science surrounding each TDI. Based on this review, we distinguish features that make for an effective TDI. We then advance a more integrative framework that seeks to highlight certain interventions that are best served for addressing certain issues within a team. In conclusion, we promote a call for evolving this robust yet disjointed TDI literature into a more holistic, dynamic, and intentional action science with clear empirical as well as practical guidance and direction.