Trade Versus Investment Liberalization

Trade Versus Investment Liberalization
复制标题

贸易与投资自由化

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Markusen
J. Markusen
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Markusen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管有一些理论贡献和大量的非正式经验证据“相反,贸易和投资是替代品的观念在贸易政策分析中仍然存在。”本文考虑了商品贸易自由化与允许直接投资的自由化与两者的结合。对于熟练劳动力相对稀缺的经济体,我表明贸易和投资自由化是完全不同的,两者在某种意义上是互补的。直觉可能是,直接投资为这样一个国家提供了关键的投入(知识密集型生产性服务业),没有这些投入,该国就无法有效利用其在某些行业的丰富要素。
Despite several theoretical contributions and considerable informal empirical evidence" to the contrary, a notion that trade and investment are substitutes persists in trade policy" analysis. This paper considers the liberalization of commodity trade versus liberalization" allowing direct investment versus the two together. For a relatively skilled-labor-scarce" economy, I show that trade and investment liberalization are quite different together are in a sense complements. The intuition may be that direct investment provides such" a country with crucial inputs (knowledge-intensive producer services) without which the" country cannot effectively exploit its abundant factors in certain industries."