Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research.

Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/bf01530454
复制
发表时间:
1994-01-01
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Bentley, J. W.
Bentley, J. W.
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bentley, J. W.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

农民参与式研究(FPR)产生了许多纲领性声明和一些技术。FPR之所以引起人们的兴趣,可能更多的是因为对绿色革命和农业机构研究的不满,而不是因为科学家和农民合作的能力得到了证明。农民和科学家之间有几个障碍,其中最重要的是社会距离。FPR的作用应严格审查;它可能是最好的工作设置研究议程,或在研究人员谁可以奉献自己在一个全职的基础上持续一段时间。
Farmer participatory research (FPR) has generated many programmatic statements and few technologies. FPR has probably been of interest more because of dissatisfaction with the Green Revolution and agricultural establishment research than because of a proven ability of scientists and farmers to collaborate together. There are several barriers between farmers and scientists, not least of which is social distance. The role of FPR should be critically examined; it may work best setting research agendas or in the case of researchers who can dedicate themselves to FPR on a full-time basis for a sustained period of time.