Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘Non-Field’
Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘Non-Field’
复制标题
转型正义、跨学科性以及“领域”或“非领域”的状态
DOI：
10.1093/ijtj/ijn044
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Bell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Bell
过渡时期司法似乎是一个既定的学术领域，与如何处理过渡时期社会过去侵犯人权行为的实践领域相联系。过渡时期司法讨论的最初重点是，人权法要求在过渡时期实行问责制，这种问责制植根于法律纪律。随着时间的推移，这一重点已经扩大到包括更广泛的机制，目标和调查跨学科的范围。为了探讨该领域的现状，本文反对目前将过渡时期正义视为一个基于实践的跨学科领域的概念。它表明，有一个隐藏的政治如何过渡司法已被构建为一个跨学科的领域，掩盖了一系列的做法和目标之间的紧张关系，它现在纳入。
Transitional justice appears to be an established field of scholarship connected to a field of practice on how to deal with past human rights abuses in societies in transition. The original focus of transitional justice discourse was that human rights law requires accountability in transitions, rooted in the discipline of law. Over time, this focus has been expanded to include a much broader range of mechanisms, goals and inquiries across a range of disciplines. In order to probe the current state of the field, this article argues against the current conception of transitional justice as a praxis-based interdisciplinary field. It suggests that there is a hidden politics to how transitional justice has been constructed as an interdisciplinary field that obscures tensions between the range of practices and goals that it now incorporates.