A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality
A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality
复制标题
典型智力参与（TIE）的方面和因素分析：与控制源和人格五因素模型的关联
DOI：
10.2224/sbp.1999.27.6.545
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
E. Ferguson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Ferguson
本文利用人格与控制源的五因素模型（FFM）探讨了典型智力投入（TIE）结构的效度。效度最初是根据一般TIE结构及其三个方面(1)问题导向思维、(2)抽象思维和(3)阅读来探索的。随后的因素分析探索证实了这三个方面，但表明存在另外两个方面：(1)智力回避和(2)智力追求作为主要焦点。智力回避与Dweck（1986）的适应不良动机概念相似。利用281名参与者的样本，我们做出并支持了许多不同的预测，例如：TIE“问题导向”思维是内部LOC和C的主要关联，而TIE“抽象思维”是I的主要关联。此外，TIE及其两个方面/因素（但不是I）与LOC相关。因此，有人认为，虽然我和TIE是通过抽象推理联系在一起的，但它们是在衡量关于个人能动性的信念方面不同的东西。
In this paper the validity of the typical intellectual engagement (TIE) construct is explored in relation to the 5 factor model (FFM) of personality and locus of control (LOC). Validity was initially explored in terms of the general TIE construct and its three facets (1) problem-directed thinking, (2) abstract thinking, and (3) reading. A subsequent factor analytic exploration confirmed these 3 facets but suggested the existence of 2 others: (1) intellectual avoidance and (2) intellectual pursuits as a primary focus. Intellectual avoidance is similar to Dweck’s (1986) notion of maladaptive motivation. Using a sample of 281 participants a number of differential predictions were made and supported, for example: TIE ‘problem-directed’ thinking was the primary associate of both internal LOC and C, while TIE ‘abstract thinking’ was the primary associate of I. Further, TIE and both its facets/factors, but not I, were associated with LOC. It was argued, therefore, that while I and TIE are linked via abstract reasoning, they are measuring something distinct in terms of beliefs about personal agency.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
GUADAGNOLI, E;VELICER, WF
通讯作者：
VELICER, WF