Discourse and representation: A comment on Batel and Castro 'Re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology'.
Discourse and representation: A comment on Batel and Castro 'Re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology'.
复制标题
话语与表征：对巴特尔和卡斯特罗“重新开启社会表征理论与话语心理学之间的对话”的评论。
DOI：
10.1111/bjso.12296
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jovchelovitch S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jovchelovitch S
Batel和Castro建议在概念上和经验上整合社会表征理论（TSR）和话语心理学（DP）。这一评论强调了不同传统的社会心理学之间的辩论的重要性，侧重于心理实体和方法论多元化的两个领域，在这两个领域中，DP和TSR之间富有成效的紧张关系仍然是显而易见的。它批评DP的心理实体的否认，并重申社会文化传统的见解，认为内在心理现象的内化社会性。它认为，而不是考虑个别的方法，重点应该是研究问题，背景和方法之间的配合。同时关注理论，研究问题和分析工具是最好的处理的局限性以及潜力的方法工具包可用于研究的意义在上下文中。
Batel and Castro propose to integrate conceptually and empirically the theory of social representations (TSR) and discursive psychology (DP). This comment emphasizes the importance of debates between different traditions of social psychology, focusing on the status of psychological entities and methodological pluralism as two areas in which fruitful tensions between DP and TSR are still evident. It critiques DP's disavowal of psychological entities and reaffirms the insights of sociocultural traditions that see intrapsychological phenomena as internalized sociality. It argues that rather than considering individual methods, the focus should be on the fit between research questions, context, and methodology. A simultaneous focus on theory, research questions, and analytical tools is best for dealing with the limitations as well as potentials of the methodological toolkit available for the study of meaning in context.