A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism
复制标题
对重用定性数据的反思：超越初级/次级二元论
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Bishop
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Bishop
虽然对定性数据的二次分析越来越普遍，但相对较少的方法研究反映了实际而非理想化的过程。本文提供了一个反思性的帐户二次分析集中在方便食品和选择的主题。研究过程的几个阶段进行检查：理解上下文，定义一个主题领域，寻找数据和采样，后来的采样和主题细化，并与成绩单。对于每个阶段，我都将探讨重用数据与首次使用数据是否不同，如果不同，这些差异是如何表现出来的。本文最后反思定性数据的主要和次要分析之间的差异，相似之处和关系。虽然研究者与被访者之间的关系存在差异，但主要分析和次要分析更相似。每种方法的适用性只能根据特定的研究问题进行评估。
Though secondary analysis of qualitative data is becoming more prevalent, relatively few methodological studies exist that provide reflection on the actual, not idealised, process. This paper offers a reflexive account of secondary analysis focused on the topic of convenience food and choice. Several phases of the research process are examined: understanding context, defining a subject area, finding data and sampling, later sampling and topic refinement, and relating to transcripts. For each phase, I explore if reusing data is different from using it in the first instance, and if so, how those differences manifest themselves. The paper closes with reflections on the differences, similarities, and relationships between primary and secondary analysis of qualitative data. Although differences exist regarding the researcher-respondent relationship, primary and secondary analyses are more alike than not. The suitability of each approach can only be assessed in light of a particular research question.