Assessment of the content validity of Functional Skills Measure after Paralysis with nominal group discussion and revision of its content
Assessment of the content validity of Functional Skills Measure after Paralysis with nominal group discussion and revision of its content
复制标题
通过名义小组讨论和内容修订评估瘫痪后功能技能测量的内容有效性
DOI：
10.11336/jjcrs.2.24
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Sonoda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Miyasaka;I. Kondo;Hiroyuki Kato;Chikako Takahashi;H. Uematsu;Chieko Yasui;Akina Tani;Mikiko Miyata;Noriko Wada;Toshio Teranishi;Yosuke Wada;S. Sonoda
宫坂H，近藤I，加藤H，高桥C，上松H，安井C，谷A，宫田M，和田N，Teranishi T，和田Y，Sonoda S.瘫痪后功能技能量表的内容效度评估，名义小组讨论和修改其内容。JPN J Comr Rehabil Sci2011；2：24�30目的：本研究的目的是评估瘫痪后功能技能量表(FSMAP)的内容效度，并对其内容进行修订，使其适用于临床环境。方法：对8名职业治疗师进行问卷调查。采用名义分组技术(NGT)测量内容效度。在使用NGT之前，我们将80%的协议作为同意的标准。如果一个项目的协议没有达到这个级别，并且该项目的内容有效性不够高，我们会修改它的内容。我们通过问卷对修订后的FSMAP进行了相同的评估。结果：在第一次评估中，15个条目中有8个条目(包括子项和描述)没有达到预定的一致水平。在第二次评估中，15个项目中有1个没有达到协议水平。我们完善了评估过程，因为我们判断FSMAP的内容效度在修订后达到了令人满意的水平。讨论：我们认为，在评估FSMAP的内容效度后，应对其进行修订，使其适合临床使用。
Miyasaka H, Kondo I, Kato H, Takahashi C, Uematsu H, Yasui C, Tani A, Miyata M, Wada N, Teranishi T, Wada Y, Sonoda S. Assessment of the content validity of Functional Skills Measure after Paralysis with nominal group discussion and revision of its content. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2011; 2: 24�30 Purpose: The purposes of this study were to assess the content validity of Functional Skills Measure after Paralysis (FSMAP) and to revise its content to make it appropriate for use in the clinical setting. Methods: Eight occupational therapists (OTs) participated in the questionnaire study. Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to measure the content validity. Before using the NGT, we set an 80% agreement as the criterion for consent. If the agreement for an item did not reach this level and the item’s content validity was not high enough, we revised its content. We repeated the same assessment for the revised FSMAP by using a questionnaire. Results: In the fi rst assessment, 8 out of 15 items (including the subitems and descriptions) did not reach the predetermined agreement level. In the second assessment, 1 out of 15 items did not reach the agreement level. We fi nished the assessment process because we judged that the content validity of FSMAP reached a satisfactory level after the revision of this item. Discussion: We think that FSMAP should be revised to make it appropriate for use in the clinical setting after assessing its content validity.
日本粗大运动功能分类系统的可靠性研究及该系统临床使用专家意见的德尔菲调查
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
I. Kondo;Toshio Teranishi;M. Iwata;S. Sonoda;E. Saitoh
通讯作者：
E. Saitoh