'Imperial Burden' or 'Jews of Africa'?: An Analysis of Political and Media Discourse in the Ugandan Asian Crisis (1972)
'Imperial Burden' or 'Jews of Africa'?: An Analysis of Political and Media Discourse in the Ugandan Asian Crisis (1972)
复制标题
“帝国负担”还是“非洲犹太人”？：乌干达亚洲危机中政治和媒体话语的分析（1972）
DOI：
10.1093/tcbh/hwq059
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Yumiko HAMAI
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
IIO Tadaki;吉本智慧子;髙綱博文;Yumiko HAMAI;飯尾唯紀;吉本智慧子;髙綱博文;飯尾唯紀;Yumiko HAMAI
所谓的“乌干达亚洲危机”（1972年）是一个案例，具体化的复杂性，英国移民政策在20世纪60年代和70年代。它也被贴上了象征希思政府在移民和“种族”问题上相对自由主义性质的标签。本文旨在重新审视英国政府对这场危机的反应，并评估英国政府迅速作出人道主义决定，接纳约28，000名亚洲裔英国护照持有人的说法。它还试图分析国家新闻话语的危机及其对公众反对接受亚洲人口谁是英国公民的影响。
The so-called ‘Ugandan Asian Crisis’ (1972) is a case that crystallizes the complexity of British immigration policies in the 1960s and the 1970s. It has also been labelled as an affair that symbolizes the relatively liberal nature of the Heath government concerning issues of immigration and ‘race’. The aim of this article is to re-examine the British government’s reaction to this crisis and evaluate the claim that the British government made a prompt, humanitarian decision to admit some 28,000 British passport holders of Asian origin. It also tries to analyse the national press discourse concerning the crisis and its impact on public opposition to accepting the Asian population who were British citizens.