The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis
The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis
复制标题
国际制度对全球权力转移的调整：分析框架
DOI：
10.1111/1758-5899.12865
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Bernhard Zangl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andreas Kruck;Bernhard Zangl
随着中国和印度等大国的崛起，以及美国或英国等大国的衰落，联合国安理会（United Nations Security理事会）、世界贸易组织（WTO）和国际货币基金组织（IMF）等国际机构面临着适应新的大国现实的压力。随着全球权力转移，新兴和老牌大国都可能挑战制度现状。与大多数权力转移和权力转移理论所假设的相反，挑战者并不总是利用权力讨价还价来追求制度调整。在某些问题领域，他们这样做，但在其他方面，他们采用替代战略，包括战略拉拢，修辞胁迫和原则说服。为了有助于更好地理解全球权力转移的制度调整，本特刊的导言将这些不同的战略理论化。首先，我们概念化权力讨价还价，战略拉拢，修辞胁迫和原则性说服作为不同的战略，制度调整。其次，我们详细阐述了挑战者选择特定策略的条件。第三，我们指定的条件下，挑战者能够通过特定的战略实现制度适应。最后，我们讨论了国际秩序的未来和全球权力转移的管理更广泛的影响。
As powers such as China and India rise, and powers such as the US or the UK decline, international institutions such as the United Nations Security Council, the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund come under pressure to adapt to new power realities. In the wake of global power shifts, both emerging and established powers may challenge the institutional status quo. Contrary to what most power transition and power shift theories assume, challengers do not always draw on power bargaining to pursue institutional adjustment. In some issue areas, they do, but in others they employ alternative strategies including strategic cooptation, rhetorical coercion and principled persuasion. In order to contribute to a better understanding of institutional adjustments to global power shifts, the introduction to this special issue theorizes these various strategies. First, we conceptualize power bargaining, strategic cooptation, rhetorical coercion and principled persuasion as distinct strategies for institutional adjustment. Second, we elaborate on the conditions under which challengers choose particular strategies. Third, we specify the conditions under which challengers are able to achieve institutional adaptation through a particular strategy. Finally, we discuss broader implications for the future of the international order and the management of global power shifts.
合法化的话语过程：绘制国际刑事法院案件中的说服岛
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Deitelhoff;Nicole
通讯作者：
Nicole