Protected Status, Sacred Sites, Black Holes and Human Agents: System, Sanctuary and Terrain Complexity
Protected Status, Sacred Sites, Black Holes and Human Agents: System, Sanctuary and Terrain Complexity
复制标题
受保护状态、圣地、黑洞和人类代理：系统、庇护所和地形复杂性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Innes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Innes
2001年9月11日之后的言论充满了对将在公众视野之外进行的行动和战斗的谈论，以努力使投票的公众为一场范围、持续时间和地点都不确定的冲突做好准备。叛乱问题很快成为新战争的核心。“避难所”、“安全港”、“操作环境”、“有利环境”：这些都是长期战争的流行语。然而，它们并不是新的职权范围。从概念上讲，避难所意味着一个复杂的地形组成的许多范例，相关，和特点。庇护所的概念和实践也有着悠久而丰富的历史，从中吸取的教训表明，也许更合适的做法是，不要从地图上静态的网格参照点的角度来看待这些问题，而是将其视为系统性的差距、裂缝、遗漏或空白，或者将其视为一系列不断演变的观点、过程和条件。
The rhetoric following 11 September 2001 was full of talk of operations and battles that would be fought out of the public view, in an effort to prepare voting publics for a conflict of indeterminate scope, duration, and indeed, of place. Locational issues were quickly made central to the new war. ‘Sanctuaries’, ‘safe havens’, ‘operating environments’, ‘enabling environments’: these were the buzzwords for the long war. They were not new terms of reference, however. Conceptually, sanctuary implies a complex terrain composed of numerous paradigms, correlates, and characteristics. There is also a long and rich history of sanctuary concepts and practices, the lessons of which suggest that perhaps it is more appropriate to think of the issues not in terms of static, grid-referenced points on a map, but as systemic gaps, cracks, elisions, or voids – or perhaps as a series of evolving perspectives, processes and conditions.