Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures
Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09658211.2015.1004350
复制
发表时间：
2016-03-15
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Rai, Lovedeep
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Flowe, Heather D.;Smith, Harriet M. J.;Rai, Lovedeep
配置处理支持准确的人脸识别，但从来没有在犯罪识别阵容的背景下进行检查。我们使用倒置范式测试了构型加工在序列中的作用。最近的研究发现，与顺序排列程序相比，同步排列中的人脸识别准确率更高。因此，我们比较了同步和顺序序列中的配置加工，以检验是否存在差异。我们让参与者观看犯罪视频，然后他们试图从同时或连续的阵容中辨认出罪犯。测试面孔可以是直立的，也可以是倒置的，因为之前的研究表明，颠倒测试面孔会扰乱结构加工。面孔的反转效应的大小在不同的排列过程中是相同的，这表明在两种过程中，配置加工是面孔识别的基础。在直立和倒立两种情况下，在不同的排列程序中，辨别准确率是相当的。讨论了这一结果的理论意义。
Configural processing supports accurate face recognition, yet it has never been examined within the context of criminal identification lineups. We tested, using the inversion paradigm, the role of configural processing in lineups. Recent research has found that face discrimination accuracy in lineups is better in a simultaneous compared to a sequential lineup procedure. Therefore, we compared configural processing in simultaneous and sequential lineups to examine whether there are differences. We had participants view a crime video, and then they attempted to identify the perpetrator from a simultaneous or sequential lineup. The test faces were presented either upright or inverted, as previous research has shown that inverting test faces disrupts configural processing. The size of the inversion effect for faces was the same across lineup procedures, indicating that configural processing underlies face recognition in both procedures. Discrimination accuracy was comparable across lineup procedures in both the upright and inversion condition. Theoretical implications of the results are discussed.