Utilization, Measurement, and Funding of Recovery Supports and Services

Utilization, Measurement, and Funding of Recovery Supports and Services
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02791072.2012.718924
复制
发表时间:
2012-09-01
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Rawson, Richard A.
Rawson, Richard A.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cousins, Sarah J.;Antonini, Valerie P.;Rawson, Richard A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

进行了一项关于物质滥用康复支持和服务(RSS)提供整个加州,这些服务是由谁提供的环境调查。对RSS衡量工作、供资机制和技术援助需求进行了询问。一项调查分发给所有57名县酒精和其他药物或行为部门的管理人员。结果表明,62%(37个中的23个)的响应县提供RSS。总体而言,认证成瘾咨询师(CAC)是最常用于提供RSS的工作人员,其次是同行,临床医生和志愿者。在恢复社区组织(RCO),同行,志愿者和CAC是最利用的工作人员。清醒的生活之家是最普遍的RCO类型,其次是恢复中心,信仰/恢复部和恢复学校。45%的县报告资助RSS; 37.8%收集数据。RSS可以为从酒精/药物使用中恢复的个人提供有价值的支持服务;然而,该领域必须进一步定义RSS并制定衡量战略,以证明RSS资助的合理性。
An environmental survey was conducted regarding substance abuse recovery supports and services (RSS) delivered across California, where these services are offered, and by whom. Inquiries were made regarding RSS measurement efforts, funding mechanisms, and technical assistance needs. A survey was disseminated to all 57 administrators of county alcohol and other drug or behavioral departments. Results indicate that 62% (23 of 37) of responding counties offer RSS. Overall, certified addiction counselors (CACs) were the staff most utilized to provide RSS, followed by peers, clinicians, and volunteers. Among recovery-community organizations (RCOs), peers, volunteers, and CACs were the most utilized staff. Sober living homes were the most prevalent type of RCO, followed by recovery centers, faith-based/recovery ministries, and recovery schools. Forty-five percent of counties reported funding RSS; 37.8% collect data. RSS may provide valuable support services for individuals recovering from alcohol/drug use; however, the field must further define RSS and develop measurement strategies to justify RSS funding.