Self-discrepancies as predictors of vulnerability to distinct syndromes of chronic emotional distress.
Self-discrepancies as predictors of vulnerability to distinct syndromes of chronic emotional distress.
复制标题
自我差异是对慢性情绪困扰的不同综合症的脆弱性的预测因素。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00472.x
复制
发表时间：
1988
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Higgins,ET
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Strauman,TJ;Higgins,ET
研究1考察了实际/自我状态与理想/自我指导之间、实际/自己状态与应该/他人自我指导之间在预测抑郁和激越症状方面的差异，以及不同类型愤怒的实际/自己理想/自我差异(AI)与2个月后测量的沮丧、挫败感和对自我的愤怒之间的差异。实际/自己的应该/其他差异(AOO)与激越、对他人的愤怒和怨恨是唯一相关的研究2使用结构方程模型对AI与AOO差异以及社交焦虑与抑郁之间的关系进行了几周后的测量。在该模型中，AOO与社交焦虑和AI与抑郁症状的关联更强。结果支持易患慢性情绪综合征的自我差异模型的收敛和判别效度
Two types of self‐discrepancy differing in bothdomainandstandpointof self‐guide were examined as predictors of vulnerability to chronic emotional syndromes Study 1 assessed discrepancy between theactual/ownself‐state and theideal/ownself‐guide and between the actual/own self‐state and theought/otherself‐guide in predicting syndromes of dejection and agitation as well as different types of anger Actual/own ideal/own discrepancy (AI) was uniquely related to dejection, frustration, and anger at self as measured 2 months later, actual/own ought/other discrepancy (AOO) was uniquely related to agitation and to anger at others and resentment Study 2 used structural equation modeling of the relations between AI and AOO discrepancy and social anxiety versus depression as measured weeks later A model in which AOO was more strongly associated with social anxiety and AI was more strongly associated with depressive symptoms provided the best fit The results support the convergent and discriminant validity of a self‐discrepancy model of vulnerability to chronic emotional syndromes