Disaster reparations? Rethinking disaster recovery through the politics of affect
Disaster reparations? Rethinking disaster recovery through the politics of affect
复制标题
灾难赔偿？
DOI：
10.1111/geoj.12526
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
O'Grady N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O'Grady N
灾难恢复在关于灾难政治的辩论中处于模棱两可的地位。虽然一些学者已经证明了恢复的趋势，复制和加剧的历史条件，支撑灾害和引导其不均衡的影响，其他人强调它的潜力，煽动试图改变这些条件，并启动新的发展道路，致力于建立更公正，公平的世界。在本文中，我们通过采访全球各地计划从COVID-19中恢复的政府组织，扩展了对灾难恢复政治的理解。该研究旨在深入了解COVID对当地社区的影响，以及不同机构为减轻这些影响而做出的安排。但我们的调查也探讨了COVID如何引发对支持集体生活的基本基础设施的当前配置和分布的重新评估。从这些采访中，我们详细阐述了“灾难赔偿”的概念，作为一个潜在的精神，可能会支持未来形式的灾难恢复。赔偿不同于那些将其重要性降低到货币问题上的演绎，它首先解决了如何通过与灾难的真实的时间展开的生活遭遇所产生的不同影响来理解灾难的问题。借鉴劳伦·伯兰特的工作，我们认为，这些影响标志着一种批评模式的普遍性，这种批评模式关注的是对灾难的“历史感”，这种灾难将它们的发生置于更广泛的历史过程和条件中，据说这些历史过程和条件构成了我们一般的当代时刻。其次，我们详细阐述了这些修复性影响如何煽动和连接有关如何动员灾难恢复来处理这些条件，从而解决更广泛的不平等问题的辩论。总体而言，本文扩展了对组织灾难恢复的认识论的学术理解，以及未来可能融入恢复实践的政治责任。
Disaster recovery holds an ambiguous status in debates on disaster politics. Whilst some scholars have documented recovery's tendency to reproduce and exacerbate the historical conditions that underpin disasters and guide their uneven effects, others emphasise its potential to instigate attempts to transform these conditions and initiate new development pathways premised on a commitment to building more just, equitable worlds. In this paper, we extend understanding of the politics of disaster recovery through interviews with governmental organisations planning recovery from COVID‐19 across the world. The research sought to gather insight on the ramifications COVID was bearing on local communities and the arrangements that different agencies were making to mitigate these effects. But our inquiry also explored how COVID had sparked reappraisal of the current configuration and distribution of basic infrastructures that support collective life too. From these interviews, we elaborate on the notion of ‘disaster reparations’ as a potential ethos that could underpin future forms of disaster recovery. Departing from renditions that reduce its significance to monetary matters, reparations first addresses ways of making sense of disasters through the different affects that arise from lived encounters with their real‐time unfolding. Drawing on the work of Lauren Berlant, we argue that these affects signal the pervasiveness of a mode of critique concerned with ‘feeling historical’ about disasters that situates their occurrence within broader historical processes and conditions said to constitute our general contemporary moment. Secondly, we elaborate upon how these reparative affects instigate and connect with debates about how disaster recovery might be mobilised to attend to these conditions and thus address broader inequities. Overall, the paper extends scholarly understanding of the onto‐epistemologies that organise disaster recovery and the political responsibilities that might be integrated into recovery practices in the future.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lauren Berlant
通讯作者：
Lauren Berlant
走向灾难恢复政治的批判地理：危机与希望的视角：走向灾难恢复政治的批判地理
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Raven Cretney
通讯作者：
Raven Cretney
格伦菲尔、紧缩政策和制度暴力
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
V. Cooper;D. Whyte
通讯作者：
D. Whyte
近海人类世的加勒比海期货：债务、灾难和持续时间
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Environment & Planning. D, Society and Space
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Sheller
通讯作者：
M. Sheller
种族、种族主义和赔偿
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Corlett
通讯作者：
J. Corlett