The Epidemic of Pneumonic Plague in Manchuria 1910-1911
The Epidemic of Pneumonic Plague in Manchuria 1910-1911
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/pastj/gtj001
复制
发表时间:
2006-02
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
M. Gamsa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Gamsa
Of the three forms of plague known to affect man, the most common bubonic variety (taking its name from the swollen ‘buboes’ that develop on the patient’s body) is carried by fleas from rodents to humans, but does not otherwise pass from person to person; before these facts were established by bacteriological science and before the emergence of antibiotics, this plague, most famously associated with the fourteenth-century Black Death, proved lethal for about 60 per cent of its victims. Swift to spread through an infected organism, and potentially fatal even with modern medical intervention, septicaemic plague (in which bacteria penetrate the blood system) would count as the most dangerous form were it to constitute an epidemic in itself, rather than a complication liable to accompany the bubonic or the pneumonic kind. That last, an extreme type of lung infection, highly contagious and still impossible to cure unless identified within the first twenty-four hours, is the rarest as well as the deadliest form of a plague epidemic. The Manchurian outbreak in the autumn of 1910 was the worst such epidemic in recorded history. The first manifestation of the plague was in Chinese territory in the vicinity of Manzhouli (now Inner Mongolia; then Heilongjiang province), a station of the Chinese Eastern Railway bordering on the Russian Transbaikal District. Begun in 1898 and fully operating since 1903, the CER was laid out by Russia as the last leg of the Trans-Siberian. Trains bound from Chita to Vladivostok entered China in Manzhouli and left it in Suifenhe (now Heilongjiang province); at a spot roughly two-thirds of the route due east, on the site of a small village in the territory of the then Jilin province, the city of Harbin was founded in 1898 as headquarters of the CER and was governed by a Russian administration until after the October Revolution. The first part of this article describes the course and aftermath of the epidemic. The second suggests an interpretation of the events that differs from previous studies, which have mostly been interested in the plague as a catalyst for the introduction of Western medicine into China. The third then examines the