Variation and fitness costs for tolerance to different types of herbivore damage in Boechera stricta genotypes with contrasting glucosinolate structures.
Variation and fitness costs for tolerance to different types of herbivore damage in Boechera stricta genotypes with contrasting glucosinolate structures.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03385.x
复制
发表时间:
2010-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mitchell-Olds T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Manzaneda AJ;Prasad KV;Mitchell-Olds T
Analyses of plant tolerance in response to different modes of herbivory are essential to understand plant defense evolution, yet are still scarce. Allocation costs and trade-offs between tolerance and plant chemical defenses may influence genetic variation for tolerance. However, variation in defenses occurs also for presence or absence of discrete chemical structures, yet, effects of intra-specific polymorphisms on tolerance to multiple herbivores have not been evaluated. Here, in a glasshouse experiment, we investigated variation for tolerance to different types of herbivory damage, and direct allocation costs in 10 genotypes of Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae), a wild relative of Arabidopsis, with contrasting foliar glucosinolate chemical structures (methionine-derived glucosinolates vs glucosinolates derived from branched-chain amino acids). We found significant genetic variation for tolerance to different types of herbivory. Structural variations in the glucosinolate profile did not influence tolerance to damage, but predicted plant fitness. Levels of constitutive and induced glucosinolates varied between genotypes with different structural profiles, but we did not detect any cost of tolerance explaining genetic variation in tolerance among genotypes. Trade-offs among plant tolerance to multiple herbivores may not explain the existence of intermediate levels of tolerance to damage in plants with contrasting chemical defensive profiles.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Fornoni, J;Núnez-Farfán, J
通讯作者:
Núnez-Farfán, J
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Agrawal, AA
通讯作者:
Agrawal, AA
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Boege, Karina;Dirzo, Rodolfo;Brown, Paul
通讯作者:
Brown, Paul
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Barto, EK;Cipollini, D
通讯作者:
Cipollini, D
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Agrawal, AA
通讯作者:
Agrawal, AA