Propensity score analysis: promise, reality and irrational exuberance
Propensity score analysis: promise, reality and irrational exuberance
复制标题
倾向得分分析:承诺、现实与非理性繁荣
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
W. Shadish
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Shadish
The aim of this work is to examine the promise that propensity scores can yield accurate effect estimates in nonrandomized experiments, review research on the realities of the conditions needed to meet this promise, and caution against irrational exuberance about their capacity to meet this promise. A review of selected experimental work that illustrates both the promise and realities of propensity score analysis. Propensity score analysis of nonrandomized experiments can yield the same results as randomized experiments. Those estimates depend on meeting the strong ignorability assumption that the available covariates well describe selection processes and on use of comparison groups that are from the same location with very similar focal characteristics. When those assumptions are not met, propensity scores may not yield accurate estimates. The use of propensity score analysis has proliferated exponentially, especially in the last decade, but careful attention to its assumptions seems to be very rare in practice. Researchers and policymakers who rely on these extensive propensity score applications may be using evidence of largely unknown validity. All stakeholders should devote far more empirical attention to justifying that each study has met these assumptions.
DOI:
10.1198/016214508000000733
发表时间:
2008-12-01
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Shadish, William R.;Clark, M. H.;Steiner, Peter M.
通讯作者:
Steiner, Peter M.
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Moser, Stephanie E.;West, Stephen G.;Hughes, Jan N.
通讯作者:
Hughes, Jan N.