Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Type I and Type II Insulin-Treated Diabetes in the Community
Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Type I and Type II Insulin-Treated Diabetes in the Community
复制标题
社区中 I 型和 II 型胰岛素治疗糖尿病的患病率和临床特征
DOI:
10.2337/diacare.17.10.1230
复制
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
影响因子:
16.2
通讯作者:
S. Weitzman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Maislos;Bettina Bodner;S. Weitzman
Accurate data on the prevalence of type I diabetes in adults are scarce (1,2). It is often difficult to identify insulin-treated diabetic patients as either type I or type II based only on clinical grounds, especially when patients have been on insulin therapy for a long time. As recently stressed, there is a continual need for accurate information on the prevalence of type I diabetes in adulthood (2). We determined the prevalence of type I diabetes and the clinical characteristics of type I and type II insulin-treated patients in the Negev region of Israel. All known diabetic patients (insulin and non-insulin-treated) ^30 years of age from three community clinics of the Kupat Holim Sick Fund (which covers ~85% of the population) in Beer Sheva, the capital of the Negev, were studied. Insulin-treated patients were classified as either type I or type II patients according to fasting plasma C-peptide levels (3,4). Data were obtained from personal interviews, patients' medical records, physical examination, and laboratory analysis. Blood chemistries were performed by an automated method (SMA). Plasma C-peptide levels were determined in all patients. Results <0.132 nmol/1 were considered negative and >0.265 nmol/1 positive for endogenous insulin secretion (6,7). In case of a nondiagnostic result (C-peptide between 0.132 and 0.265 nmol/1), a glucagon test (8,9) was performed; a flat response was regarded as negative endogenous insulin secretion. Data obtained from questionnaires, physical examination, and the laboratory from each subject were coded and stored. Differences between means were computed using the Student's t test. Prevalence of comorbid conditions and diabetic complications were age-adjusted, using the combined population of type I and type II insulin-treated patients as the standard. The study target population comprised 9,573 adults >30 years of age; 588 subjects (6.1% of the study population) were diabetic; 100 patients (1.0% of the study population) were insulin-treated; 96 patients (36 men, 60 women) consented to enter the study. Seventeen percent of all known diabetic patients (100 of 588) were insulin-treated. Only 25% (24 of 96) of all insulin-treated patients had insulinopenic type I diabetes (by low Cpeptide levels). Thus, the prevalence of type I diabetes in adults in the Negev area of Israel was 2.5:1,000 (24 of 9,573). Table 1 contains data regarding age, age at diagnosis of diabetes, first treatment at diagnosis of diabetes, blood laboratory parameters, diabetes complications, and comorbidity (such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, retinopathy, and albuminuria) in the type I and type II insulin-treated patients. This is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that a comprehensive study on the prevalence of type I diabetes in adulthood, based on determination of fasting plasma C-peptide levels, has been done in Israel. The prevalence of type I diabetes in adults contrasts with that estimated for children in Israel (10). However, the figures correlate if only the patients diagnosed before age 20 are considered. Similarly, our results agree with studies performed elsewhere (1,2). Contrasting with our results, Laakso and Pyorala (11) reported that al-