Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study
Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study
复制标题
替西罗莫司在日本不可切除或转移性肾细胞癌患者中的实际应用:基于上市后全病例监测研究结果的近期考虑
DOI:
10.1093/jjco/hyaa062
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Akaza Hideyuki
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sugiyama Shigeru;Sato Kazuo;Shibasaki Yoshiyuki;Endo Yutaka;Uryu Taku;Toyoshima Yasuharu;Oya Mototsugu;Miyanaga Naoto;Saijo Nagahiro;Gemma Akihiko;Akaza Hideyuki
ObjectiveA prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma in Japan.MethodsPatients prescribed temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma were registered and received temsirolimus (25 mg weekly, intravenous infusion for 30–60 minutes) in routine clinical settings (observation period: 96 weeks).ResultsAmong 1001 patients included in the safety analysis data set (median age, 65.0 years; men, 74.8%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, 69.6%), 778 (77.7%) reported adverse drug reactions. The most common (≥10%) all-grade adverse drug reactions were stomatitis (26.7%), interstitial lung disease (17.3%) and platelet count decreased (11.1%). The incidence rate of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was 4.5%. The onset of interstitial lung disease was more frequent after 4–8 weeks of treatment or in patients with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (21.6% for score 0 vs 8.3% for score 4,P< 0.001). Among 654 patients in the effectiveness analysis data set, the response and clinical benefit rates were 6.7% (95% confidence interval 4.9–8.9) and 53.2% (95% confidence interval 49.3–57.1), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 16.9–21.1).ConclusionsThe safety and effectiveness profile of temsirolimus observed in this study was similar to that observed in the multinational phase 3 study. The results are generalizable to the real-world scenario at the time of this research, and safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus as a subsequent anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma warrants further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01210482, NCT01420601).