Interpersonal and intrapersonal emotional processes in individuals treated for alcohol use disorder and non-addicted healthy individuals.

Interpersonal and intrapersonal emotional processes in individuals treated for alcohol use disorder and non-addicted healthy individuals.
复制标题

接受酒精使用障碍治疗的个体和非成瘾健康个体的人际和人际情感过程。

DOI:
10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.006
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Wojnar,Marcin
Wojnar,Marcin
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kopera,Maciej;Trucco,ElisaM;Jakubczyk,Andrzej;Suszek,Hubert;Michalska,Aneta;Majewska,Aleksandra;Szejko,Natalia;Łoczewska,Agata;Krasowska,Aleksandra;Klimkiewicz,Anna;Brower,KirkJ;Zucker,RobertA;Wojnar,Marcin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

IntroductionPrior的工作在很大程度上证实了酒精使用障碍(AUD)个体中存在各种情绪处理缺陷;然而,它们的特异性和相关性仍然值得研究。目前研究的目的是比较情绪处理的选定方面(即,心理状态识别,述情障碍,情绪智力)之间的个人治疗的AUD和健康individuals.MethodsThe AUD样本包括92个禁欲的男性与AUD谁参加了为期8周的住院禁欲为基础的治疗计划在华沙,波兰。健康对照组(HC)由86名来自华沙医科大学和Nowowowiejski医院行政人员的男性组成。获得了有关人口统计学、精神病理学症状和酒精问题严重程度的基线信息。精神状态识别使用阅读心灵的眼睛测试(RMET)进行评估。采用多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)测量述情障碍。结果与结论在MANCOVA模型中,AUD患者在识别和描述自己的情绪状态方面存在缺陷,与HC相比,AUD患者的情绪调节能力较低。在自我报告的对他人情绪的识别、社交技能和精神状态识别的行为测量方面,没有观察到组间差异。
IntroductionPrior work largely confirms the presence of various emotional processing deficits among individuals with an alcohol use disorder (AUD); however, their specificity and relevance still warrant investigation. The aim of the current study was to compare selected aspects of emotional processing (i.e., mental state recognition, alexithymia, and emotional intelligence) between individuals treated for an AUD and healthy individuals.MethodsThe AUD sample consisted of 92 abstinent men with AUD who were participating in an 8-week inpatient abstinence-based treatment program in Warsaw, Poland. The healthy control (HC) group consisted of 86 men recruited from the Medical University of Warsaw and the Nowowiejski Hospital administrative staff. Baseline information about demographics, psychopathological symptoms, and severity of alcohol problems was obtained. Mental states recognition was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). Alexithymia was measured with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). The Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) was used to measure emotional intelligence (EI).Results and conclusionsAfter accounting for potentially confounding variables (demographics, severity of depression, anxiety symptoms) in MANCOVA models, patients with AUD presented deficits in identification and description of their own emotional states, as well as lower emotion regulation skills when compared to HCs. No between-group differences were observed in self-reported recognition of other people's emotions, social skills, and a behavioral measure of mental states recognition.Specific rather than general emotion-processing deficits in participants with AUD were identified, suggesting problems with processing of intrapersonal emotional signals.