Powerful Pharma and Its Marginalized Alternatives?
Powerful Pharma and Its Marginalized Alternatives?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1027/1864-9335/a000347
复制
发表时间：
2018-09-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Imhoff, Roland
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lamberty, Pia;Imhoff, Roland
关于决定医疗选择的基本心理过程，人们只知道一点点。在四项研究中，我们确定阴谋心态预测了对替代生物医学疗法的偏好。研究1a（N = 392）和1b（N = 204）提供了相关性支持，研究2（N = 185）实验性地测试了权力的作用：如果药物的批准得到了无权（与有权）代理人的支持，则支持阴谋心态的人会更积极地看待药物。研究3（N = 239）通过比较分析与整体方法再次显示了权力和阴谋心理对药物评价的调节作用。这些发现指出了阴谋心态对健康行为和预防计划的后果。
Only tittle is known about the underpinning psychological processes that determine medical choices. Across four studies, we establish that conspiracy mentality predicts a preference for alternative over biomedical therapies. Study 1a (N = 392) and 1b (N = 204) provide correlational support, Study 2 (N = 185) experimentally tested the role of power: People who endorsed a conspiracy mentality perceived a drug more positively if its approval was supported by a powerless (vs. powerful) agent. Study 3 (N = 239) again showed a moderating effect of power and conspiracy mentality on drug evaluation by comparing analytic versus holistic approaches. These findings point to the consequences of conspiracy mentality for health behavior and prevention programs.