Improving health outcomes in diverse and vulnerable populations: building on the experience of the Centers for Medical Treatment Effectiveness in Diverse Populations (MEDTEP).
Improving health outcomes in diverse and vulnerable populations: building on the experience of the Centers for Medical Treatment Effectiveness in Diverse Populations (MEDTEP).
复制标题
改善多样化和弱势人群的健康结果:借鉴多样化人群医疗有效性中心 (MEDTEP) 的经验。
DOI:
10.1080/1355785022000060682
复制
发表时间:
2002
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Elm,JordanJaskwhich
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tilley,BarbaraC;Elm,JordanJaskwhich
A recent report by the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) 1 suggests that racial/ethnic disparities in health outcomes in the USA remain (see Figure 12), and persist after adjustment for access and other socioeconomic factors. The report also suggests that health disparities are partially attributable to disparities in health care. It is obvious from the IOM report that we need to think differently and more deeply about the concept of race. According to Nickens, 3 historically the idea of race in the USA has been based in particular biological and political contexts. The notions of race and inferiority developed at least in part in the context of the economic system of colonialism. Modern ideas about race have changed, as has the diversity of the population which has been fed by immigration.There are five major flaws in the current concept of race:(1) race does not reflect current genetic and biological knowledge;(2) race has been shaped by history but distorted by it as well;(3) the race/class schemes are highly imprecise;(4) wide variability exists within classifications of ‘race’; and (5) thinking in terms of data categorized by race can lull investigators away from thinking about other important factors that must be considered, such as socioeconomic status. However, the concept of race in the USA is a powerful one that cannot be ignored. Health disparities are not unique to the USA. The World Health Organization has collaborated with the UN to encourage countries to develop health programs for indigenous people and promote research on inequalities in health care to inform countries so that they can take appropriate action. 4 Examples from the UK, South Africa, and Australia illustrate responses to this initiative. The Chief Medical Officer of the UK Department of Health reports that despite overall improvements in health the gap between socially disadvantaged and affluent sections of the population has widened. The UK government has made the elimination of inequalities in health a top priority. 5